Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Me ting - January 16, 1981 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS <br />e. Mrs. Baumgartner continues... <br />$1,314.00 into a Redevelopment Escrow Account <br />and that way has qualified for the amount of <br />assistance. That is also the reason for the <br />August 8, 1980 bid opening date and the reason <br />why it is coming to you now. Initially a recom- <br />me dation was made because they were both 20% <br />un er the cost. <br />Mr Cira: Kathy, let me ask you something. <br />If Stickler is willing to do the work and does <br />everything that Charles Brown is supposed to do <br />and does it for $7,900.00, why don't you give it <br />to him? <br />Mr McMahon: Is there a non- performance or is <br />he just busy? <br />. Baumgartner: Right now he is busy. <br />Mrs McMahon: Is there a non - performance problem? <br />. Baumgartner: No. <br />M6 Cira: I can't see throwing away $1,400.00. <br />Mrs. Baumgartner: I can understand. The only <br />tU ng that I am saying is that you have indicated <br />to us that you would like the Bureau and the Ad- <br />visory Board to maintain the 20% rule and you <br />would make the recommendation. <br />Mr McMahon: Then the Commission would decide <br />ho to handle that when it came. <br />Mr Cira: I am more worried about the 20% over. <br />I as not worried about the 20% under. <br />Mr;. Kolata: I haven't attached them but I have <br />here the other specifications for the ones that <br />ara for the two bids under, so if you would like <br />to look at those they are available. <br />Mr,IBut1er:: These are established contractors, <br />th y have been doing work for a number of years. <br />Ha there ever been a performance problem? <br />13 <br />