My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SM 06-12-80
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
SM 06-12-80
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 4:10:35 PM
Creation date
9/25/2012 4:32:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Be d Redevelopment Commission <br />Special eeting - June 12, 1980 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS <br />b. Mir. Ellison continues.... <br />tandpoint exhibits those qualities <br />hich warrant an incentive to cause <br />edevelopment treatment to take place. <br />r. Butler: This is the first petition <br />hich has been filed with the Council <br />nd submitted to the Redevelopment <br />epartment for its review under the <br />ew procedures. It is my interpreta- <br />ion of the ordinance that we are to <br />ook at the specific property on which <br />he project is going to be redeveloped. <br />n the ordinance itself I believe there <br />s considerable language that leads to <br />hat conclusion. Beyond that, the <br />epartment was involved in the develop - <br />ent of the process itself. This matter <br />as considered during the development <br />f the process, and it is my understanding <br />hat the intent was to limit the review <br />y the department and then ultimately <br />y other bodies who are going to be <br />ooking at it, to the specific <br />arcel in question when it comes to <br />he issue of whether the project is <br />oing to be developed or going to occur <br />n land that has been bypassed or under - <br />tilized due to economic circumstances <br />hich have deterred normal development. <br />s Mr. Szarwark i rtdi Cates as a rule the <br />ouncil when ultimately making the <br />ecision, is going to look to our recom- <br />endation along with recommendations <br />y other bodies. However, our recommend - <br />tion as based upon the report is directly <br />elated to that interpretation. If the <br />ouncil determines that our interpreta- <br />ion is wrong then of course, they are <br />of going to follow, that is,:assuming <br />f the Commission were to adopt the <br />taff's report. <br />r. Szarwark: May I ask the Commission <br />or this, then? I think that there is <br />general agreement with respect to the <br />acts, namely that our parcel of real <br />state is not blighted but that the <br />eighborhood is such that general <br />onditions.... <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.