Laserfiche WebLink
South Bead Redevelopment Commission <br />Specialf�eeting - June 12, 1980 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS <br />b. dontinued.... <br />r. Ellison: They do, however, there <br />s a strategic problem here as I see <br />t. If the Commission finds that the <br />rea does not qualify from a condition <br />tandpoint, in order to satisfy the <br />tate statute, the Human Resources <br />ommittee or someone would have to <br />ind that the conditions warrant the <br />batement. Conditions are the "kicker" <br />or the abatement; not economic need. <br />r. Cira: Mr. Ellison, if you apply <br />or tax abatement you must reside in <br />"blighted" area. <br />r. Ellison: The exact property that <br />ossberg owns that is being petitioned <br />n our opinion is not blighted. <br />r. Cira: They aren't going to purchase <br />ny of the area which is "blighted" area <br />or their addition so how can they qualify? <br />r. Nimtz: Mr. Szarwark's position is <br />hat the strip along there by Good <br />ousekeeping looks good, but his <br />osition is that if you look down Fellows <br />treet and Tutt Street ect, things <br />ren't too good, isn't that right <br />r. Szarwark? <br />. Szarwark: That is exactly right. <br />r. Ellison: I think I concur <br />ith him. I don't think there is <br />ny question, in fact, the report <br />escribes the a_rea,`for which the.abate- <br />ent is petitioned as a pocket of <br />ealth in an otherwise declining <br />esidential neighborhood. I think <br />t is a rather precise and exact <br />escription and it is accurate. <br />r. Robinson: If we were to reject <br />his petition could the other agencies <br />ive a plus vote and the project be <br />ent back to us for re- consideration. <br />. Butler: It would not have to come <br />10 <br />