My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 01-18-80
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
RM 01-18-80
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 4:24:18 PM
Creation date
9/25/2012 3:49:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting - January 18, 1980 <br />7. PR GRESS REPORTS <br />Ms. Derbeck: When is the projected <br />completion date? Is it the summer of 1981? <br />Mr. Ellison: No, it is for the summer of <br />1932. <br />Ms Derbeck: Is there any word on the Odd <br />Fellows Building yet? <br />Mr. Nimtz: We have had several discussions <br />with the Mayor, and there has been no further <br />progress on the Odd Fellows Building. <br />Ms Derbeck: Are you working on any of the <br />Dr nosals? <br />Mr. Ellison: Not very hard at this time. I <br />have had discussions with the people who have <br />submitted proposals. I am more interested <br />in January 23, 1980 when the State Review <br />Board meets on the application of the Historic <br />Pr servation Commission for the addition of <br />th se buildings to the West Washington <br />Di trict. I have written a letter to them <br />pursuant to the Commission resolution which <br />wa3 passed in our December 7, 1979 meeting <br />objecting to that and in addition, <br />Ma or Parent has written a similar letter <br />objecting. <br />Ms Derbeck: The Mayor is objecting to the <br />addition of the Odd Fellows Building being <br />placed in the historic district of the West <br />W hin -Qton area? <br />Mr. Ellison: That is correct. The procedures <br />require that the owner be consulted and also <br />that the Chief Executive Officer of the City <br />be consulted. The Commission's objections <br />are more technical, but essentially held that <br />thD application for the designation was <br />de ective because it did not follow the <br />re lations and procedures which were required <br />for adding to the historical district, therefore, <br />th application should not be considered. The <br />State, nonetheless is going to consider it now. <br />Ma or Parent's letter had to do with a more <br />practical matter. He simply described progress <br />to this point. The State will have both <br />letters then as they review the matter on <br />Ja uary 23, 1980. <br />-26- <br />DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING <br />PROGRESS ON ODD FELLOWS <br />BUILDING - (ANY DECISION <br />MADE AS TO HISTORICAL <br />DESIGNATION) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.