My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 01-02-80
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
RM 01-02-80
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 4:25:13 PM
Creation date
9/25/2012 3:34:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bed Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting - January 2, 1980 <br />4. COW NICATIONS <br />Mr. Butler continues... <br />he legal fees to the Commission drastically. <br />am very proud of my record of service and <br />ntegrity. The members of the Commission and <br />he department staff know that I am extremely <br />rateful for the confidence which they have <br />onsistently expressed in me and in my work. <br />regret the repeated pressures that have been <br />laced on the Commission to remove me as their <br />ttorney through the years and the time the <br />embers have had to spend on this particular <br />ase especially, when they had to vote on this <br />atter. Obviously, I cannot advise the Com- <br />ission concerning the Nemeth - Brunner memo. I <br />o believe that the appointment of special <br />ounsel to review the memorandum would be a <br />elcome opportunity to clear the air in this <br />atter. <br />Nimtz: Thank you, Mr. Butler. I do believe <br />that Commissioner Auburn has a motion she <br />d like to present to the Commission. <br />Auburn: The letter I had written follows <br />on Mr. Butler's comments concerning appoint - <br />nt of outside special counsel. I, as a <br />mmissioner, feel that we place Mr. Butler <br />. an extremely tenuous position when we ask <br />m to give us legal counsel on a matter that <br />is involved in. Likewise, Mr. Nimtz, as <br />esident of the Commission, is not in a position <br />give us, as Commissioners, outside legal <br />vice on how to handle a matter such as this <br />.en it comes before us. I think we owe it <br />ourselves as Commissioners, I think we owe it <br />the staff, I think we owe it to Mr. Butler, <br />d I think we owe it to the public to engage an <br />tside neutral party to advise us on how to <br />ndle this matter. There are apparently some <br />legations that would have severe legal ramifi- <br />tions on not only the "hole ", but perhaps some <br />the other matters that the Commission has <br />tered into and I think that we need someone <br />guide us on how to proceed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.