My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 01-02-80
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
RM 01-02-80
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 4:25:13 PM
Creation date
9/25/2012 3:34:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Be d Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular eeting - January 2, 1980 <br />FLOOR DISCUSSIONS (continued) <br />s. Auburn: I think the issue Ms Derbeck <br />s bringing out is good, and I think it is <br />omething that Mr. Butler and the rest of us <br />ave discussed. All of us have tried to do <br />usiness and set up the Commission in such a <br />ay that it is not an issue. The question is, <br />f the developer looks at that coming into <br />outh Bend, do they automatically assume that the <br />lace to do business is where we all do business, <br />r what we all own, because that would give you the <br />nside track in getting things approved by the <br />omission. I would hope that what comes back <br />nd what we have talked about with the Michiana <br />itle Corporation (not doing business with <br />evelopers), would satisfy that. <br />r. Richard Hill: We have discussed that par- <br />ticular issue earlier in terms of whether the <br />cope of special counsel would include looking <br />t what the Commission, or the action of the <br />Commission, has taken relating to Michiana, and <br />ave special counsel address the issue of whether <br />at does take it out of the conflict situation. <br />ut I would think that really what it comes down <br />o is looking at what steps the Commission has <br />aken and then having outside counsel determine <br />Nether that is adequate. <br />. Derbeck: A very important point that <br />yor Nemeth's memorandum stressed.that this <br />s. the potential to jeopardize some downtown <br />velopments. <br />Nimtz: The Commission's staff has had some <br />cussions with the regional counsel of HUD. <br />ically, he has said he is not getting involved <br />local issues, that he was satisfied with the <br />lacement of the policy, and as far as he was <br />cerned. that ended the matter. <br />is. Derbeck: I agree that there was not a sub - <br />>tantial amount of money involved but I am not <br />>ure that really makes a difference. It is the <br />LDDearance of a conflict that makes a difference. <br />-19- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.