My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 01-02-80
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
RM 01-02-80
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 4:25:13 PM
Creation date
9/25/2012 3:34:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bond Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting - January 2, 1980 <br />6. NEK IBU5INESS (continued) <br />a. (continued... <br />a <br />Nimtz: There is also a question here <br />to whether there has been a fair appraisal <br />not by the Court appointed appraisers. <br />[r. Kolata: Originally our appraisals were <br />alued at $5,050. The Court appraisal figures <br />ame in at $5,400. That check went into the <br />ourt in 1974 and the check was withdrawn. <br />ecently, the original owner's son has had an <br />ppraiser who stated that he had gone into the <br />omes when they were still intact, and he felt <br />hat they were worth $11,000, not the $5,400 <br />hat the Court appointed appraisers had set. <br />hey are trying to settle for a higher amount <br />han the $5,400. <br />Chair directed that Mr. George Patton, deputy <br />sel to the Commission, proceed to trial with <br />matter, and advise Mr. Goheen that we cannot <br />de to his request.. <br />Ellison: I'd like to mention that this parcel <br />within the NDPA -10 project area that ultimately <br />ulted in the construction of Dean Johnson park <br />the Southeast neighborhood. <br />ted for Consultant <br />Inc. and Carl El <br />ison. <br />between <br />r. Ellison: I.was asked a few weeks ago, by a <br />irm called Abt. Associates, Inc., a consulting <br />irm out of Cambridge, Massachussetts that is <br />nder contract with HUD, to basically evaluate <br />he guidebook HUD suggests using in doing environ- <br />ental reviews. They have been asked to revise it <br />nd also to make some recommendations to HUD as <br />o changes in regulations that are necessary to <br />ake the environmental review process work better <br />n a national level. Abt's contract with HUD <br />equires that they secure a national panel of <br />xperts and I was asked to be one of these <br />xperts, primarily from a local point of view. <br />have a feeling that it results in part from <br />y great interest in the historic preservation <br />rea as it relates to environmental review processes. <br />n any event, I agreed to do this without any <br />nderstanding of the details. This is essentially <br />five month project in which Abt. Associates sends <br />o a panel bits of information which are then to be <br />-13- <br />CONSULTANT AGREEMENT <br />REQUEST BETWEEN ABT. <br />ASSOCIATES, INC. AND <br />CARL ELLISON APPROVED <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.