Laserfiche WebLink
South Be #d Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular eeting - November 21, 1980 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (continued) <br />b. continued.... <br />. Baumgartner: We went back to the <br />tractor who did the initial clean -up <br />got our figure for the additional <br />k from that person as opposed to <br />ther contractor. <br />. Nimtz: These are all the low bidders? <br />Baumgartner: In this case, these are <br />homes where we just went back to the <br />ractors who did the clean -up. <br />. Nimtz: He convinced you that the steps <br />be done was not required of him in his <br />ieinal bid? <br />rs. Baumgartner: Those are the contractors <br />ho did the grant work, but those are not the <br />ontractors we are paying now. We just went <br />ack to the contractors who did the clean up <br />ork in the last couple of weeks, and askedf <br />hem for a price. <br />r. Nimtz: HUD has no objection to this? <br />rs. Baumgartner: No. <br />rs. Auburn: With the exception of that first <br />ontractor your bids are almost exactly like <br />Dur cost estimates. <br />rs. Baumgartner: That one (Art Cherry) was <br />ifficult to tell because it was a roof <br />roblem. <br />. Robinson: Don't you have to explain <br />HUD even though this is a clean-up, <br />at the contractor really did for this kind <br />money? I don't see it in here. <br />rs. Baumgartner: Certainly. We did not <br />ttached the bid specifications but we can <br />n the future. <br />. Robinson: No, I was just curious. We <br />e approving a contract, and we don't know <br />at the heck we are approving it for. I <br />ought that was kind of unusal so that's why <br />inquired. <br />-7- <br />