RM 10-17-80 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

South Bend Redevelopment Commission Regular Me ting - October 17, 1980 6. NEW BUSIINESS b. Mrsj. Baumgartner continues... now we.�are talking about an overage, not an under, a , so it seems that in the future 312 Rules they ar stinking fairly close to the 10 %. Mr. Nimtz: The HUD thing is 10 %, the Bureau of Housing is 20 %. If you Urant to go ahead with Stickler, the Chair will vote that way. It is up to Pete, then. My understanding of the Par lia entary regulations, we need three votes to do anything this morning. Mr. Donaldson: I have to agree with Bob. Mr. Sti kler has been very good as far as we are concerned. Mr. Nimtz: To refresh your memory, Kathy says Mr. Stickler has been a plumber, and he has gotten into the general contracting business and we have given him seven general contracts, two of which he as begun working on. None of them have been com leted yet, and we have not received any com- plaints on the ones he is working on. Let's han le this contract separately. Mr. Cira made a motion that the bid contract for Pamela Jernigan, 1149 East Miner, be awarded to GRANT BID R. . Stickler. Mr. Donaldson seconded the motion AWARDED and it was unanimously carried. (1149 EAST Mrs. Baumgartner: I have a question regarding our pro edures. Would you like for us then to main- tai our 20% recommendation to the Commission, or would you prefer us to take under advisement what has happened here. Mr. Nimtz: The tenor I get of the Commission is that you should go ahead and follow the 20 %. Where you get a contractor that is established, with whom you have had no difficulty, let him go ahead even tho gh he is under the 20 %. Mrs tha tha do Baumgartner: Do you want the Bureau to make recommendation or the Advisory Board to make recommendation, or did you wish that recommenda to come from the Commission? 12 CONTRACTS MINER)