Laserfiche WebLink
South B <br />Special <br />6. NEW <br />e. <br />Redevelopment Comission <br />ting - August 22, 1980 <br />SINESS <br />ntinued..... <br />. Ellison continues... <br />occurs to me that selling land <br />r a dollar is a benefit and thus, <br />e waiver would apply. <br />. Nimtz: This is a request for <br />D to submit a waiver for that <br />Ellison: It is for two things. <br />.rst it is a public acknowledgement <br />at we are selling the land to a <br />ty employee, and secondly it is <br />request for a waiver from HUD. <br />.ese are rather cumbersome procedures <br />D has asked us to go through on other <br />milar situations but the process <br />nds to be routine. <br />. Donaldson: Is it mandatory that <br />go that route? <br />. Ellison: I believe so. HUD should <br />mply it and allow public acknowledgement <br />d a local approval. But the current <br />sition of the Area Counsel is that they <br />in fact need to waive the condition <br />the grant agreement because there is <br />provision in the regulations or the law <br />at allows them to delegate to us the <br />thority to approve these with their <br />volvement. <br />Donaldson made a motion to approve and <br />pt Resolution No. 623 authorizing <br />lic acknowledgement of sale of land <br />Ind. R -57 (LaSalle Park) to a city <br />loyee, and requesting HUD waiver of <br />s requirement, seconded by W. Cira <br />the motion was unanimously carried. <br />11 <br />RESOLUTION NO. 623 <br />APPROVED RE: PUBLIC <br />ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SALE <br />OF LAND TO CITY EMPLOYEE <br />(LASALLE PARK) IND. R -57 <br />