Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend lWevelopment Commission <br />Special Meeting - August 8, 1980 <br />6. NEW <br />e. Yx.lEllison continues.... <br />will have to have that same question <br />an red for them but I don't believe <br />it does set that kind of precedent. In <br />the case an attempt was actually made <br />to file an application in late 1979 <br />under the old five year statute, and <br />whem it was determined that abatement <br />was no longer available by that time, <br />we bad already taken 'a position that <br />we zmd the City were not going to <br />be processing applications until a <br />procedure had been established. <br />Therefore, Hablin had to begin con- <br />s tion. I think they really met <br />the spirit by attempting to file <br />back in December. <br />Mr. Robinson: What happen to the tax <br />abatement petition we turned down for <br />Mos s berg? <br />Mr. Ellison: That one was recommended <br />to the Council and the Council passed <br />a &claratory resolution and I believe <br />it is now on its way to Area Plan for <br />Their approval or back to the Council <br />for confirmation. <br />Mr. Butler: I would say additionally <br />that: the statute itself does not require <br />that: the application be submitted before <br />any construction commences or before a <br />building, permit is granted. <br />Mr. Harold Brueseke: I appreciate <br />Re velcpment's interest in their <br />willingness to consider the application <br />and allow these gentlemen to show their <br />int rest in the abatement. <br />Mr. Robinson made a motion that the <br />staff report from the Department of <br />Reckrvelopment relative to a tax. abate- <br />men request from the Hablin Company, <br />Inc. relative to an area commonly <br />referred to as 225 -229 S. Michigan <br />be Eppraved and that the Redevelopment <br />C cr 'ssion recommend.to the City Council <br />that: this petition be granted, seconded <br />by . Donaldson, and the motion was <br />unar�imouslv carried. <br />-17- <br />