SM 08-08-80 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

South Bend development Cornnission Special Meeting - August 8, 1980 6. NEW BUS$ESS (continues) c. Mr. Ellison: Essentially what the random calls for is that rather thmi going through the expense and the enormous amount of staff time that would be associated with both the providing of information and enrollment of applicants City -wale for only two parcels of land, it bec s practical for the 'Commission to ern-it us to modify the plan and s' ly go back and recontact those pers,ons who applied during Phase II who were unsuccessful in the process. We have reason to believe that we will be easily able to dispose of the two remaining parcels through tha process. In the event that we e unable to, then we would wan permission to contact persons who were successful and who received the maximum amount of lots we made available to them during the Phase II process. It is our feeling that giv the cost associated with trying to 'spose of the two parcels, and given the overall objective of trying to assure that persons who live and own property in the area had prefer.. - enc for the land, it seems reasonable to the staff that we should be allowed to eviate from the original plan by imp ementing the procedure outlined in the memo. Mr. any Mr. Nintz: Mr. Butler, do you see legal complications in this? Butler: No. Ms.lAuburn: It certainly seems like an fficient way of doing things. Mr. Ellison: We began with 128 parcels in Phase I, had 48 parcels in Phase II, and now have 4 miring parcels. Mr. Robinson made a motion to adopt the revisions of the LaSalle Park Disposition Plwi as outlined in the Memorandum of Ms. Bathon of August 7, 1980, seconded by Ms. Auburn, and the motion was unanimously carried. ONE