My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SM 08-08-80
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
SM 08-08-80
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 4:09:14 PM
Creation date
9/25/2012 2:41:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend development Cornnission <br />Special Meeting - August 8, 1980 <br />6. NEW BUS$ESS (continues) <br />c. Mr. Ellison: Essentially what the <br />random calls for is that rather <br />thmi going through the expense and <br />the enormous amount of staff time <br />that would be associated with both <br />the providing of information and <br />enrollment of applicants City -wale <br />for only two parcels of land, it <br />bec s practical for the 'Commission <br />to ern-it us to modify the plan and <br />s' ly go back and recontact those <br />pers,ons who applied during Phase II <br />who were unsuccessful in the process. <br />We have reason to believe that we <br />will be easily able to dispose of <br />the two remaining parcels through <br />tha process. In the event that <br />we e unable to, then we would <br />wan permission to contact persons <br />who were successful and who received <br />the maximum amount of lots we made <br />available to them during the Phase <br />II process. It is our feeling that <br />giv the cost associated with trying <br />to 'spose of the two parcels, and <br />given the overall objective of trying <br />to assure that persons who live and <br />own property in the area had prefer.. - <br />enc for the land, it seems reasonable <br />to the staff that we should be allowed <br />to eviate from the original plan by <br />imp ementing the procedure outlined <br />in the memo. <br />Mr. <br />any <br />Mr. <br />Nintz: Mr. Butler, do you see <br />legal complications in this? <br />Butler: No. <br />Ms.lAuburn: It certainly seems like <br />an fficient way of doing things. <br />Mr. Ellison: We began with 128 parcels <br />in Phase I, had 48 parcels in Phase II, <br />and now have 4 miring parcels. <br />Mr. Robinson made a motion to adopt the <br />revisions of the LaSalle Park Disposition <br />Plwi as outlined in the Memorandum of Ms. <br />Bathon of August 7, 1980, seconded by <br />Ms. Auburn, and the motion was unanimously <br />carried. <br />ONE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.