My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Rm 09-15-78
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
Rm 09-15-78
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 5:03:20 PM
Creation date
9/24/2012 3:22:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Redevelopm nt Commissi.on Regular Meeting <br />September �5, 1978 <br />7. PROGRESS REPORTS (Cont'd) <br />Mr. Dave Anderson: Mr. Ellison, you are saying that HUD appears to <br />be confident that the litigation pending down state, whether it is <br />from tie Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals appear confident <br />that tie Redevelopment Commission will win that lawsuit? <br />Mr. Ellison: I didn't mean to imply that. HUD is aware that there <br />is litigation, but HUD of course, has no position on that. HUD is <br />apparently, by their actions, confident that the locality, can in fact, <br />execute project. That is the confidence I spoke of. HUD considers the <br />litigation a local matter. <br />Mr. An erson: HUD would routinely release money for projects whether <br />they are under litigation or not, and by doing so, there is no <br />reflec ion on the quality of the case or any other matters that may enter <br />into tie problems here. <br />Mr. E1 ison: That is correct. Sometimes HUD might have cause not to <br />releas funds if they are a party to the suit, or if they feel that the <br />federa interest in the project would somehow be jeopardized. <br />8. NEXT COMMISSION MEETING NEXT <br />COMMISSION <br />Octobe 6, 1978, at 10:00 A.M. MEETING <br />9. ADJOURNMENT ADJOURNMENT <br />There being no further business to come before the Commission, <br />Mr. Dotialdson made a motion that the meeting be adjourned, seconded <br />by Mr. Robinson, and the motion was unanimously carried. The <br />meeting was adjourned at 10:15 A.M. <br />n <br />Carl Ellison, Director <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.