My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 06-02-78
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
RM 06-02-78
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 5:05:13 PM
Creation date
9/24/2012 2:39:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Commissioners' Regular Meeting and Public Hearing <br />June 2, 1978 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS, Continued <br />John & Earlene Fitzpatrick <br />10i Woodward Avenue <br />David Allen & Deborah Thorn <br />701 Cottage Grove Avenue <br />Mary Ann Woodham <br />910 Stanfield <br />Frederick A. & Mary R. Bradley <br />7171 N. Francis St. <br />Amount Loan Number <br />$ 8,650 18/7MC- 0011/26/1 <br />15,750 18 /7MC- 0011/28/1 <br />5,700 18 /7MC- 0011/27/1 <br />11,400 18 /7MC- 0011/29/1 <br />Mr. Wiggins: Do you,have all the documentation there? <br />Mr. Brownell: I have it all here. <br />Mr. Wig ins then moved for approval of all six 312 Loan Applications, seconded <br />by Mr. onaldson and carried. <br />7. PROGRESS REPORTS <br />Mr. Brownell: There are no progress reports this morning. <br />Chair: We should make note of the fact that the $100 filing fee has been <br />paid to the Supreme Court....Kevin, you might explain what that is. <br />Mr. Butler: This is a transfer fee from the Court of Appeals to the Supreme <br />Cou t. <br />Ms.�Derbeck: That means then that you are moving the case to the Supreme <br />Cou t? <br />Mr.l Butler: We are trying to. <br />Mr. Nimtz: Trying to transfer the case from the Court of Appeals to the <br />Sup reme Court, that would be the correct cognomen and nomenclature? <br />Ms. Derbeck: You paid a $100.00 filing fee charge today, that was approved? <br />You are bypassing the Court of Appeals? <br />Mr. Nimtz: We are trying to, we have asked the Supreme Court to take <br />jur- sdiction over the matter—The $100 is the fee paid to the clerk of <br />the Supreme Court. <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.