My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 05-05-78
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
RM 05-05-78
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 5:05:44 PM
Creation date
9/24/2012 2:36:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Beno Redevelopment Commission <br />Commissio ers' Regular Meeting <br />Friday, Mo 5, 1978 <br />4. COMMUNICATIONS <br />Therelwere no communications. <br />5. OLD BUSINESS <br />(a) Letter to Mr. Carl Ellison, Director, Community Development, from <br />Dr. Robert W. Dew, tabor Relations Specialist, De artment of Housin <br />nd Urban Development in Indiana olis, dated A ri1 21, 1978, Re: W <br />Rates for Rehabilitation Contract, Bureau of Housing. <br />r. Brownell read the letter in its entirety. <br />r. Nimtz: For those who were not in attendance at the last meeting, <br />his is the result of a prolonged discussion we had at our last <br />eeting concerning wage rates, and a conflict arose concerning what <br />irections and what the signals were. Mr. Brownell and Mr. Butler <br />ere directed to communicate with Mr. Dew relative to this, and this <br />s a result of that contact.and communication. <br />r. Brownell: Mr. Butler and I agree that we should recommend to you <br />hat the contracts that were presented at the last meeting by <br />r. Harcus should be disapproved because they do have wage rates <br />pecified in them. Is that your understanding Mr. Harcus? Mr. Butler? <br />oth Mr. Harcus and Mr. Butler agreed that this was the proper procedure. <br />. Nimtz: I believe everything was tabled pending the outcome of <br />is clarification, but I believe the proper motion now is that the <br />ntracts as proposed be rejected. <br />Robinson moved for rejection of the contracts as proposed, seconded <br />Mr. Cira and it was carried. <br />r. Nimtz commented that Mr. Harcus would have to start over but at <br />east they have a clarification. Mr. Harcus agreed that the problem <br />as resolved temporarily. <br />r. Brownell mentioned that he had received another communication which <br />ame to him too late to be included in the agenda, and proceeded to read <br />he memo from Ms. Anita Fields, dated May 4, 1978, Re: Bureau of Housing <br />age Determinations. <br />chair directed that Ms. Field's memo be received and placed on file. <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.