Laserfiche WebLink
South B <br />Special <br />Redevelopment Commission <br />ting April 20, 1978 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd <br />r. Nimtz: HUD is threatening that when they audit us, that <br />his will be a non - approved expenditure, and we would have to come <br />p with the money from someplace else to put back into the pot. <br />A mo ion was made by Mr. Robinson for disapproval of the award of the <br />contract to Jurtin's Construction Company, seconded by Mr. Donaldson, and it <br />was carr ed. <br />r. Brownell: Do you wish to pass on the other two contracts? <br />s. Derbeck: Is Jurtin's contract based on prevailing wage <br />cale or not? <br />r. Robinson: I don't believe it is. <br />r. Wiggins: All of the contracts are probably based on the <br />age scale that they were provided with. <br />r. Robinson: Yes, the wage scale that Mr. Harcus has. <br />s. Derbeck: Is that the wage scale that you usually use? <br />r. Harcus: Yes, ma'am. <br />s. Derbeck: Then HUD does not approve? <br />Harcus: No, this is the prevailing wage that we have published <br />r the last year. We have asked for an update of that to ensure <br />at this is either an update or has to be updated. <br />r. Wiggins: In view of your communications with the gentleman from <br />UD, do you have any assurance that this time the wage scale would be <br />pproved and would not be to their disapproval? <br />r. Harcus: If a wage scale is proper, the regulation says there is <br />o conclusion date when the prevailing wage publication terminates. <br />ou can go on using it. <br />. Wiggins: This wage scale that you have, was it furnished to <br />u by HUD, and does it have HUD's approval? <br />. Harcus: I don't know what preceded my arrival here sir. <br />