My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 11-04-77
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
RM 11-04-77
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 5:11:04 PM
Creation date
9/24/2012 1:14:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REDEVELO MENT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES <br />NOVEMBER 4, 1977 <br />PAGE FOUR <br />4. COMMUNICATIONS (CONT'D) <br />c) A peal of the adoption of Resolution Nos. 540 and 542 by Edith <br />H wley and Angela Berg. <br />Mr. prownell reported that this matter has been given to our <br />atto Heys to handle this'..law'suit'. <br />Mr, imtz indicated that there is no further action necessary to <br />this as it has already been referred to legal staff for proceeding. <br />5. OLD <br />a) A <br />r <br />Mr. <br />that <br />that <br />Chan <br />has <br />for <br />tion <br />the <br />will <br />Mr. <br />brie <br />city <br />basi <br />are: <br />to t <br />for <br />wdul <br />we a <br />that <br />been <br />is a <br />squa <br />when <br />come . <br />a sq <br />lett <br />appri <br />cred <br />cont: <br />press <br />that <br />potei <br />This <br />earns <br />INESS <br />eement between the redevelopers and the Redevelopment Commission <br />arding the purchase of project land in the future. <br />rownell indicated that this agreement has now been to HUD and <br />this draft was approved with one minor change; that of wording, <br />instead of South Bend Redevelopment Department it will be <br />ed to City of South Bend Redevelopment Department. Mr. Butler <br />ade that change and has furnished the contract to the investors <br />heir signature. Commission approval is requested and authoriza- <br />for the president and secretary to sign it today. As soon as <br />nvestors sign and give us proper security Commission signature <br />be necessary. <br />3utler indicated he would go over the provisions of the contract <br />Fly. The parties to the agreement are the Commission, the civil <br />and the investors. The agreement is broken down into three <br />parts;.the first part the obligations of the investors which <br />to submit a bid for the real estate in question subject only <br />ie following provisions; that redevelopment offers the property <br />>ublic bid by April 1 of 1979 and that the minumum bid price <br />I not exceed,$450,00Oi00 Dollars.. - - -- This does not mean that <br />°e locked into an appraisal of less than $450,000.00, it means <br />if it is more than that they need not bid. This figure has <br />discussed with Real Estate Research and they feel that this <br />reasonable figure for the property in question, about 150,000 <br />•e feet at about $3.00 a square foot. As a frame of reference <br />talking about a large area of property the appraised value <br />down. For example, Block 6 where the property sold for $.91 <br />Lare foot. The next obligation of the investors is to submit a <br />.r of credit payable to the Department of Redevelopment in the <br />it of $45,000.00. This figure was arrived at as it is 10% of the <br />oximate appraised value of the land in question. This letter of <br />.t will provide that if a bid is not submitted as required in the <br />-act they will lose that $45,000.00. At the time that they <br />ant their bid they would be presenting a bid bond of 10% assuming <br />the bid is $450,000.00. This has not been required: by any other <br />.tial investor when they expressed an interest in the property. <br />amount is appropriate since HUD was asking for some kind of <br />!st money. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.