Laserfiche WebLink
5. OLD BUSINESS, Continued - <br />b. ReQuest for Commission approval of Change Order No. 1 to Contract <br />ECD /PR /CS -3/22 with Ted Combs, Inc. for a net decrease in contract <br />rice of $120.00 for amended contract price of $6,574.62) as set <br />orth in letter from Mr. Kenneth Schaller, Project Director, and per <br />nstructions from Kevin J. Butler, Commission Attorney. <br />r. Brownell: This is a bathtub materials change from cast iron to <br />steel too, isn't it? <br />r. Schaller: Yes, this is the same thing. <br />Chair: This is the one on Haney Avenue, isn't it? <br />r. Schaller: No, this is on Pennsylvania Avenue. <br />r. Wiggins moved approval of Change Order No. 1 to Contract SECD /PR/ <br />S -3/22 with Ted Combs, Inc. for a net decrease of $120.00. Mr. Cira <br />seconded and motion carried. <br />c. Request for Commission ap rova1 of Change Order #1 to Contract SECD /PR/ <br />S -3/25 with Ted Combs, Inc. for a net decrease in contract price of <br />203.50 for amended contract total of $5,254.67), as set forth in <br />etter from Mr. Kenneth Schaller, Project Director, and per instructions <br />rom Kevin J. Butler, Commission Attorney. <br />r. Brownell: This is the one on Haney Street. <br />r. Butler: Ken, are we ready to approve this one until the contractor <br />nd subcontractor have come to some resolution or understanding between <br />hemselves? My thought is that when the subcontractor went out and <br />ooked over the job he was not bidding on a tub. The specifications <br />ere ambiguous with respect to whether or not a tub was even called <br />or in our instructions - or I mean "specifications ". There was no <br />uestion that the subcontractor's specifications from Combs — that <br />t (the tub) was not called for. Apparently there was no trap behind, <br />s I recall, and there was some additional plumbing work inside that <br />ad to be taken care of. Perhaps not all of that $195. credit for the <br />ub is appropriate in this case. I wonder if we shouldn't let them <br />esolve their difference before approving this one. What do you <br />hink? I would recommend that we table this. <br />r. Schaller: Fine. <br />he Chair directed that this Change Order be tabled until the next <br />ession. <br />r. Butler: Ken, if you will let them know that we did this, the <br />ommission did table this and that by the next Commission meeting <br />.hey should have the matter resolved so they can make a recommendation. <br />Ir. Wiggins moved to table this item, Mr. Cira seconded and motion <br />,arried...this Change Order will be considered at the next session. <br />- 4 - <br />