My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 01-21-77
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
RM 01-21-77
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 5:15:21 PM
Creation date
9/24/2012 12:22:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6. NEW BUSINESS, Continued- <br />Mr Brownell: The reason for the objection is that four of these <br />are above our maximum limit and on the other two, the recommendation <br />of the Committee was that the bids were so much higher than we thought <br />the cost should be. <br />the ball park? <br />got. <br />the bid on Contract -56 <br />ion carried. <br />next item before the <br />Mr Cira: Then this one (Contract -56) is in <br />Mr Wiggins: Yes, and it's the only one they <br />Mr Cira then seconded the motion to approve <br />as recommended by the Advisory Board and mot <br />Mr Brownell then mentioned item 6(c) as the <br />Commission. <br />Mr Robinson moved for rejection of the six contract bids - Contracts <br />nu ber -60 through -65. Motion was seconded by Mr. Wiggins and carried. <br />d. Commission approval requested for Change Order No. 1 to Contract CHANGE ORDER <br />No SECD /PR /CS -7/54 with Slatile Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. for an in- NO. 1,CONTR. <br />crease in contract amount of $300, for an amended contract total of SECD /PR /CS- <br />$4 700.00. This dwelling is located at 506 E. Broadway, The owners /54 APPROVE <br />are Floyd & Roberta Williams. $300.00 <br />Mr Brownell read the Change Order additions and the explanation for <br />sa e. <br />Mrs Wiggins moved for approval of the Change Order. <br />Mr Robinson asked how long - or what's the difference in time between <br />th inspection and actual occurrence? <br />MrJ Schaller: This one was within about sixty (60) days. <br />Ch ir: As I recall, in response to Lloyd's previous questions about <br />th s some weeks ago, you are trying to cut down this period to less <br />ti e. <br />Mr <br />Mr. <br />Mr <br />Mr <br />Mr <br />Mr. <br />jo. <br />Mr. <br />Mr <br />Schaller: That is correct. <br />Robinson: Has the cold weather had any effect on this? <br />Wiggins: It probably did. <br />Schaller: Yes, it did. <br />Robinson: When water gets under something, it has to go somewhere. <br />Schaller: The calking around the flat section of the roof where it <br />Ins the house had deteriorated. <br />Robinson: There wasn't any indication before this then? <br />Schaller: No. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.