My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 01-21-77
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
RM 01-21-77
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 5:15:21 PM
Creation date
9/24/2012 12:22:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5. OLO BUSINESS (Continued)- <br />c. Continued- Mr. Evans agreed that somebody needs to negotiate with <br />Indiana Bell but, as pointed out by Mr. Wiggins, why could it not <br />be our own attorney? <br />. Wiggins: The other aspect of this is that HUD is picking up the <br />b. <br />r. Evans: Yes, and they need to be satisfied. <br />. Wiggins: That is within their province. <br />Mr.lEvans: Thank you, I'm sorry, I did not mean to hold up the .(meeting). <br />Chalir: This claim is comparable to the I & M claim. <br />Mr.lEvans: Right, I understand. <br />The Chair called for the vote and Commission approval of Amendment to <br />Contract for Technical Services with S. M. Dix & Associates, Inc. was <br />una imous..contract time of performance to be extended to December 31, <br />1977 and maximum compensation shall be increased $2,000, for amended <br />contract price of $8,000. <br />d. equest for Commission approval of easement agreement between the <br />Department of Redevelopment and parties of interest in Block 6 Develo <br />men t, subject to review and approval by the Department of Engineering <br />of the City of South Bend. By letter of January 17, 1977, Mr. Kevin <br />Butler issued legal opinion and recommendation for grant of Joinder <br />in asement, subject to such review and approval. <br />C. dayne Brownell indicated that he would prefer to re -word the above <br />paragraph (d) and said that actually "what we need to do is consider it- <br />the Joinder in Easement- and after we get the changes made that were <br />sug ested by the Engineering Department in letter dated October 15, <br />1975 from Rollin E. Farrand, then we will bring it to you for approval. <br />Mr. Farrand wrote to Mr. Seitz some time ago ..at this point Mr. <br />Brownell read Mr. Farrand's letter to Mr. Seitz..Mr. Brownell then <br />stated that he felt we need to work out a satisfactory easement agree - <br />men before we bring it to you for approval, rather than to approve it <br />this morning. <br />The Chair asked for the proper procedure..perhaps to refer the matter <br />bac to legal staff. <br />Mr. Brownell stated that we have a letter from Mr. Butler—he then <br />reao the letter in its entirety..and said his.point was that he would <br />lik to get the approval of the Engineering Department before we act. <br />Chair: Lloyd, do you agree with that? <br />Llo. d Robinson: Yes. <br />M". <br />EASEMENT <br />JOINDER - <br />BLOCK 6 <br />DEVELOPERS <br />REFERRED TO <br />ENGINEERING <br />DEPT. FOR <br />CHANGES <br />PRIOR TO <br />APPROVAL <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.