My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 01-21-77
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
RM 01-21-77
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 5:15:21 PM
Creation date
9/24/2012 12:22:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. COMMUNICATIONS. Continued- <br />a.(continued) St. Joseph River East bank. The following discussion <br />took place: <br />Chair: We are talking about the re- excavation of this thing. As <br />you know, through my Southhold activities I have been involved <br />in quite a bit of this situation with the National Register <br />of Historic "Places and I just don't see how this would <br />qualify, under what we want to do. It might after we get <br />it re- excavated but the way it is now it is a matter of <br />restoring it to its use - not use but for scenic beauty and <br />for aesthetic value. I just don'.t see how this would come <br />within the province of that until it actually gets done. <br />Anyway this will move forward. <br />Don Wiggins: Let me ask you a question too, because I was under the <br />impression Lawson Associates in their study of the river bank <br />area and in the actual engineering study or whatever went on, <br />had at least found significant markers or things that would <br />.delineate this so that it could be submitted for inclusion <br />in the historic register. I was under the impression that this <br />had been done, that it was already registered, or whatever. <br />r. Brownell: No, I don't think so. <br />Chair: No, it's a very involved process. <br />Ir. Wiggins: Have any preliminary steps been taken? <br />r. Brownell: We thought we were taking the preliminary steps. We <br />talked to a man who does investigating for the National Parks <br />Service. <br />hair: The authority really on this thing is Ruth Price, so we'll <br />get her on this. <br />Ir.. Brownell explained that he spoke with John Fisher and Seitz and <br />hey got together and wrote the letter and didn't get a reply, that <br />as in September, so he wrote another letter. <br />11r. Wiggins: Yes, well, the reason I asked, it looked to me like this <br />is a question of "do not pass go, do not collect $200, go <br />back to square one ". <br />r. Brownell: Here are all the usual documents on it. <br />hair: Don, I don't think they will do a thing the way it is now, it <br />is filled in, see. <br />r. Brownell: We may have to dig it out, we do know where it is and <br />can prove it. <br />. Wiggins: Well, I'd like to have them clean and dig it out. <br />- 3 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.