SM 01-04-77 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6. NEW (b) (c) BUSINESS, Continued Mr.- Brownell explained that this concerns the relocation claim IND. BELL TEL. of Indiana Bell Telephone Company which I reported on a moment RELOCATION ago - "that they called me this morning and said they would send CLAIM us a letter authorizing us to get a consultant on it ". Commission approval requested to enter into repair service con- tract with Dictaphone Corporation - contract covers dictating_ and transcription equipment which was purchased from them on December 9, 1976, in the amount of $21.00 for the first year of the contract and if we decide to go beyond that, it will be $42.00 per year thereafter, for a period of no more than eight (8) years in total, with approval on a year to year basis. Mr. Brownell: At this time we I understand it of $21.00. Mr. Nimtz then asked Ms. Barth to be satisfactory and respons Mr. Wiggins moved for approval of $21.00 for the coming year, and it carried. 7. PROGRESS REPORTS are undertaking an obligation as if she had found the equipment was in the affirmative. of the service contract at a cost Mr. Robinson seconded the motion Mr. Brownell reported that he had talked to Mr. Nunemaker who advised that the Nunemaker firm is preparing the protective fence or barrier for the bridge area in the shop and would install it after it was completed in the shop. Mr.1 Wiggins: When does he anticipate that it will be done? Mr.1 Brownell: He was expecting to get it done by today. REPAIR SERVICE CONTRACT DICTAPHONE CORP. Mr. Brownell then stated that he had had no report at this time from ei her the attorney for the claimant or from Batchelder on this $13,000 cl im that the lumber company made and we are still holding the money. Mr. Brownell: Also, on the Odd Fellows Building, we still have that matter of the "unsightly" wall and I have had Mr. Bauer who is with us this morning, look into it and he has written a memo on the subject- YOL have a copy in your packet I believe, without reading the entire me no to you, the end result of this demolition left the Odd Fellows Building the sole use of the party wall and the scars there...I do 't know whether the Commission feels it necessary to hire an engineer to check this out for us or not. If you will recall, the letter from thE 104 South Main Joint Venture group, signed by Rett Donnelly was to thE effect that this weakened and crumbling wall is a disfigurement to the community as well as to the Odd Fellows Building and consti- tu es a substantial danger to the public using the parking lot next to this wall ... falling bricks, etc. As far as we have been able to - 4 -