| 6. NEW (BUSINESS (Cont'd 
<br />Motion for the approval of Change Order No. 4 to Rehabilitation 
<br />Contract No. 16 was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Cira. 
<br />Mr. Gene Evans, Executive Secretary, Civic Planning Association, 
<br />raised the question on having a contract with the original con- 
<br />tractor, Ted Combs Decorating & Construction Company, for 
<br />$7,722.69, and having a second contractor, Slatile Roofing and 
<br />Sheet Metal Company, with the contract price of $1,570.00, on 
<br />how that will work out, with reference to the memorandum? Mr. 
<br />Crighton advised the contract with Slatile will be deducted 
<br />from Ted Combs' contract relative to the items that Slatile is 
<br />completing that the original contractor was to have completed 
<br />in his contract. The original contractor will not be paid the 
<br />full amount of the contract obviously, so he will be taking 
<br />the loss on the portion the other contractor is completing. 
<br />This has been under negotiation for some time. 
<br />The vote for the approval of the above Change Order was unani- 
<br />mous and motion was carried. 
<br />e. 
<br />Change Order No. 1 to Rehabilitation Contract No. SECD /PR /CS -2/21, CHANGE 
<br />Southeast Community Development Housing Program: Approval was ORDER 1 
<br />requested of this Change Order, for a decrease in contract amount TO REHAB 
<br />of $40.00, with Fleming Masonry Construction Company, (Contract: CONTRACT 
<br />$3,975.00), or an amended contract total of $3,935.00, with con- SECD /PR /CS- 
<br />tract time unchanged, for rehabilitation work at: 707 E. Indiana 2/21 AP- 
<br />Avenue, in the Southeast Community Development Housing Program. PROVED, 
<br />SECD HOUSIN, 
<br />Mr. Brownell read Mr. Kenneth J. Schaller, Project Engineer's PROGRAM 
<br />memorandum, which states that the homeowner is having additional 
<br />work performed on the exterior of her home and prefers to have 
<br />those individuals scrape and paint her gutters and downspouts. 
<br />The work the homeowner is having completed does not conflict 
<br />with the contract specifications. This work totals $40.00 and 
<br />would be deleted from the contract amount, reducing the contract 
<br />amount to $3,935.00. Staff recommends the Change Order for ap- 
<br />proval. 
<br />Motion was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Cira and carried, 
<br />for the approval of Change Order No. 1 to the above Contract, 
<br />for a decrease in contract amount of $40.00, or an amended con- 
<br />tract total of $3,935.00, in the Southeast Community Development 
<br />Housing Program. 
<br />f. Change Order No. 1 to Rehabilitation Contract No. SECD /PR /CS -3/23, CHANGE 
<br />Southeast Community Development Housing Program: Approval was ORDER 1 
<br />requested of this Change Order, for an increase in contract amount TO REHAB 
<br />of $396.00, with Area Services, Inc., Contract: $7,276.00), or CONTRACT 
<br />an amended contract total of $7,672.00, with contract time un- SECD /PR /CS- 
<br />changed, for rehabilitation work at: 407 E. Ohio Street, in the 3/23 AP 
<br />Southeast Community Development Housing Program. PROVED, 
<br />SECD HOUSING 
<br />The specifications called for painting of the walls in the bath PROGRAM 
<br />room. However, because of the present condition of the walls and 
<br />also the type of covering on the walls, the contractor recommends 
<br />- 7 - 
<br /> |