Laserfiche WebLink
7. NEW <br />BUSINESS (Cont'd <br />9r. Keith Crighton advised only one (1) contractor submitted bids <br />)n this set of contracts; two other contractors picked up bid <br />iocuments but did not have time to submit their bids. The bids <br />,eceived were from Slatile Roofing & Sheet Metal Company, and are <br />:onsiderably over our cost estimates. Bids received are: <br />CONTRACT <br />SLATILE ROOFING & <br />NO. <br />ADDRESS <br />SHEET METAL COMPANY <br />30 <br />313 <br />E. Calvert Street <br />$ 6,872.00 <br />31 <br />630 <br />E. Dayton Street <br />7,085.00 <br />32 <br />719 <br />E. Haney Avenue <br />7,670.00 <br />33 <br />207 <br />E. Ohio Street <br />7,285.00 <br />34 <br />1414 <br />Marietta Street <br />6,385.00 <br />35 <br />911 <br />Marietta Street <br />6,945.00 <br />36 <br />206 <br />E. Pennsylvania Ave. <br />9,668.00 <br />37 <br />1015 <br />Marietta Street <br />9,770.00 ** <br />Less $1,400.00 Electrical, or total Bid Price of $8,370.00. <br />otion was made by Mr. Robinson, seconded by Mr. Cira and unani- <br />mously carried, to accept the recommendation of the Southeast Adv. <br />Committee and reject the above bids received on Contract Set No. <br />, for Rehabilitation Contract Nos. 30 through 37, in the South- <br />east Community Development Program. <br />b. Ome Order No. 1 to Rehabilitation Contract No. SECD /PR /CS -2/13, CHANGE <br />In Southeast Community Development Program: Approval was request- ORDER NO.1 <br />d of this change order, for an increase in contract amount of TO REHAB. <br />1,180.00, with Fleming Masonry Construction Company, (Contract: CONTRACT <br />4,605.00), or an amended contract total of $5,785.00, for rehabi- SECD /PR /CS- <br />itation work at: 408 East Keasey Street, Southeast Community 2/13 APPROV <br />evelopment Housing Program. <br />er Mr. James L. Johnson, Jr., Chief Inspector, in his memorandum <br />f May 18, the specifications called for front rear porch wooden <br />ecks to be replaced and painted; the kitchen and bathroom walls <br />ere to be painted; and asphalt shingles were to cover the front <br />orch. Since the time of the initial inspection, both the front <br />nd rear porch decks have almost collapsed, and the kitchen and <br />athroom walls have deteriorated. <br />r. Brownell advised the additions shown are in amount of $1,660.00, <br />nd the deletions are in amount of $480.00, leaving a net increase <br />f $1,180.00. <br />r. Crighton advised the most costly item is the front porch. The <br />riginal specifications called for just installing the tongue and <br />roove on both the front and rear porches; but when the contractor <br />tarted to tear it out, they found it to be severely deteriorated. <br />he front porch instead is being replaced with 140 square feet of <br />locks, 42 lineal feet concrete footings, and 120 square feet con - <br />rete floor, and replace 130 square feet plywood sheathing on roof. <br />he rear porch is being replaced with 5 ft. x 6 ft. platform, in- <br />- 15 - <br />