My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SM 04-23-76
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
SM 04-23-76
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 9:03:23 AM
Creation date
9/21/2012 3:02:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6. NEW BU$INESS (Cont'd <br />in�Crease in contract total of $311.25, with an 'amended contract <br />total of: $7,208.88, Southeast Project E -7. <br />Co issioner Robinson asked how long is this going to last doing <br />it in this manner; is it a stop gap measure? Mr. Cr ighton answered <br />that with proper maintenance, it should last for 10 or 15 years. <br />Co missioner Wiggins added that 90 lb. rolled roofing °is a pretty <br />good grade. <br />Motion carried. <br />i. Change Order No.] to Rehabilitation Contract No. 52 Southeast C.O. NO. 1 <br />Pr ject E -7: Commission approval was requested of Change Order TO CONTRACT <br />No. 1 to Rehabilitation Contract No. 52, with Barany Sheet Metal & NO. 52 AP- <br />Heating Company, for an increase`in contract amount of $122.00, _ PROVED, <br />(C ntract: $5,243.00) or an amended contract total of: $5,365.00, SOUTHEAST <br />fo rehabilitation work at: 113 East Keasey Street, Southeast Pro- E -7 <br />je t E -7. <br />The memorandum from Mr. James L. Johnson, Jr., Chief Inspector, <br />advised the specifications called for the two rear entrance doors <br />to be replaced, including the frames, jambs and thresholds; also <br />the rear porch deck to be replaced. Since the time of the initial <br />inspection, the rear porch joists and side rails have deteriorated. <br />Thle front entrance door has also deteriorated. <br />The contractor proposes to delete the cost of the two (2) rear <br />do Dr frames, jambs and threshold and install the front entrance <br />do 3r for that price; the only increase in price will come from <br />the two 2 x 8's, six ft. long and five 2 x 8's, seven ft. long <br />to secure the rear porch. The deletion amount runs $110.00 and <br />th added work $232.00, or a difference of $122.00 for an increase <br />to the contract amount, with an amended contract total: $5,365.00. <br />Co missioner Wiggins asked if the door is salvageable, or if the <br />of er is needed worse and what is the trade -off? Mr. Johnson., <br />Chief Inspector for the program, advised that he talked to the <br />carpenter several days ago and he had indicated that he can repair <br />the frames, jambs and threshold on the rear two entrance doorways <br />anJ take that off the specifications and instead give us a new <br />solid core door for the front entrance door which has deteriorated <br />since the time of inspection. <br />Co issioner Robinson said he will ask the same age -old question: <br />"H )w long of a period of time will elapse from the inspection to <br />the actual time on the job site ?" Mr. Johnson advised about a <br />year. <br />Motion was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Donaldson and <br />carried, for the approval of Change Order No. 1 to Rehabilitation <br />Contract No. 52, with Barany Sheet Metal & Heating Company, for an <br />increase in contract amount of $122.00, with an amended contract <br />total of $5,365.00, Southeast Project E -7. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.