My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 02-20-76
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
RM 02-20-76
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 9:11:57 AM
Creation date
9/21/2012 2:43:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6. NEW 9USINESS (Cont'd) <br />re in a good staff position now to where we can get a good objective <br />iew. We got a lot of valuable experience out of the LaSalle Park <br />-57 Project." <br />Ir. John V. Lindstaedt, Fair Tax Association, stated "We are <br />pending the public's money, and I must admit, gentlemen, it all <br />omes out of the same pockets. it seems to me that sometimes <br />ou have to take a hard long look at where this money is being <br />pent, and how much you really get for the. dollar investment." <br />e Chair asked if there were any further questions or discussion. <br />ere being none, the Chair requested a motion. <br />tion was made by Mr. Wiggins for the approval of the proposed <br />reement between the Department of Redevelopment and Newbill Con- <br />ruction Company (outlined in Item 6e, page 12), seconded by Mr. <br />naldson. <br />e Chair asked if there were any further questions. There being <br />,ne, he asked for their votes: All signify by saying, "Aye" - <br />sponse on "Aye" votes was made by four (4) Commissioners: Messrs. <br />ggins, Donaldson, Cira, Nimtz. Contrary "No" vote request: Com- <br />ssioner Robinson cast a "No" vote. Motion was carried, with <br />ur (4) "Ayes and one (1) "Naye" vote. <br />Mr. Dan Caesar asked Mr. Robinson if he would state the reason he <br />v ted "No" and Commissoner Robinson responsed, "Yes. Because I <br />t ink it is unfair to the other contractors that bid on this <br />p oject- -that this guy get preferential treatment. The rules of <br />tie game are laid out before he ever bid on the Project, so why <br />s ouldn't he have to live with the original rules ?" <br />7. PROGRESS REPORTS <br />None. <br />8. NEXT COMMISSION MEETING <br />The n xt Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Commission wi11 be at <br />10:00 a.m., Friday, March 5, 1976, in the Office of the Department <br />of Re evelopment. <br />9. ADJOURNMENT <br />Motion was duly made by Mr. Robinson, seconded by Mr. Donaldson and <br />carri d, for adjournment, at 11:08 a.m. <br />C. Wa <br />(SEAL <br />, Executive Direc <br />NEXT <br />COMMISSION <br />MEETING: <br />3 -5 -76 <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />=H= <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.