RM 02-06-76 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6. NSW BUSINESS (Cont'd performance bond is hard to secure and small contractors have this problem to hassle. If we do not have the "conditional award" then we would have to come back to the Commission and ask for a rejection to the previous award, go back to the Common Council, and then have to go through the whole process for approval again, which would be a delay cif at least six (6) weeks. The "conditional award" request is as noted in the letter dated December 31, 1975, to Mr. Brownell from Mr. Crighton, and included in the packet, which states: Since Newbill Construction Co. is a new contractor under the Community Development Program, we are requesting a conditional award subject to that company fulfilling all contract requirements. In the event that this firm is unable to comply with these requirements, we are requesting that these contracts be awarded to the following contractors listed as the next lowest bidders: #11 /SECD* $2,271.38 Combs Decorating #12 /SECD* 3,366.20 Combs Decorating #15 /SECD* 4,727.28 Combs Decorating #18 /SECD ** 5,500.00 Madison Builders, Y, Construction & Construction & Construction Inc. ( *) Subject to approval by Legal Counsel only. ( * *) Subject to Common Council and Legal Counsel approval. At the consent of the Commissioners, the prior motion was rescinded, and the motion is amended to read, that the above contracts, (Nos. 11 /SECD, 12 /SECD, 15 /SECD and 18 /SECD)be awarded to Nevibill Construc- tion Co.,in the bid amounts as noted above by Newbill, as a "condi- tional award" subject to that Company fulfilling all contract re- quirements; in the event the firm is unable to comply with these requirements, the contracts are to be awarded to the next lowest bidders, as are noted above in the indented quote, [Contract #18 in this case would require Common Council approval also.] All are subject to Legal Counsel approval, and the President.and Secre- authorized to execute said Contracts. The amended motion was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Donaldson and carried. f. Change Order No. 1 to Rehabilitation Contract No 65, Southeast Project E -7: Commission approval was requested of Change Order No. 1 to Rehabilitation Contract No. 65, with Madison Builder's, Inc., for an increase in contract amount of $209.00, (Contract: $3,912.00), or an amended contract total of: $4,121.00, for re- habilitation work at: 605 E. Indiana Avenue, Southeast Project E-7. The letter by Mr. James L. Johnson, Jr., Chief Inspector, to Mr. Crighton, advises the specifications called for replacing the front porch tongue and groove floor 330 square feet. When - 13 - CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO REHAB. CONTRACT NO. 65 APPROVED, E-7