My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 01-16-76 (2)
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
RM 01-16-76 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 9:15:03 AM
Creation date
9/21/2012 2:23:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont' d <br />some of the things on here ... he would have to be blind, or <br />something...not to see them the first time around. I can't <br />understand that. There must be something wrong with the <br />people doing the inspections; there must bei for such an increase <br />in cost on so many projects. Mr. Schaller again stated these <br />inspections were done prior to any of the people on his staff <br />working here. Commissioner Cira asked, "What's the time element <br />on some of the inspections from the time that we have construc- <br />tion - -the improvements on it ?" .Mr. Schaller advised on this <br />particular house here '[226,East Pennsylvania Avenue], the house <br />was inspected.on October of 1974. That is the reason. Commissioner <br />Cira- .said;: "That's what is bad; can't we get any quicker action ?" <br />Mr. Butler questioned the '74, and asked if he doesn't mean '75. <br />Ken stated the '74 is not incorrect; it was inspected in October <br />of '74. The present houses for CD right now - -that have been <br />awarded for the Southeast Area - -are being worked on now. Com- <br />missioner Wiggins said these things have leaked for a year or more <br />after they were inspected, and the damage just goes on. Commissfoner <br />Cira-- concurred;-'that`is- what`is bad, and the cause of the excessive <br />damages, but Commissioner Robinson questioned the procedure and <br />advised he would think when they are put out for bid; hat someone <br />would be sent out to recheck it or something. Ken sa -id he believed <br />this Contract 48 goes back to last spring. Commissioner Robinson <br />said if they checked it out that far ahead of time, if they don't <br />hurry up and go back and check it sometime, the place could be <br />burned down and there wouldn't even be a place there. <br />Mr. Schaller said there is considerably less time on the CD con- <br />tracts that we are working on now; they are being worked on within <br />four months. Commissioner Cira said that is one of the problems <br />right there. As to why, Mr. James L. Johnson, Jr., Chief Inspector, <br />advised mainly because the inspections are first, contracts are <br />advertised and awarded, then they have to be approved by Legal <br />Counsel, then the Preconstruction Conference has to be set up <br />by Mr. Alford, after which if the contractor has more than five <br />or six contracts, he has 30 days in which to complete each of these <br />contracts, and say if we award 10 contracts at the same time; maybe <br />they take the first five contracts first, and most of them have <br />gone over 30 days on some of these older structures, so that just <br />puts them off further and further. A lot of these contracts were <br />approved in February and March of last year. Ms. Derbeck added <br />that this would mean if a contractor gets six contracts at once, <br />then he has 30 days for each one, so he may never get to one of <br />them for six months. JJ confirmed that has been the way it has <br />worked in the past. On the Pennsylvania Avenue there is a gap <br />of approximately 15 months and Ms. Derbeck said that is kind of <br />hard to understand, and wouldn't it be better to hold off until <br />that contractor gets caught up? With the rate of inflation, <br />Commissioner Cira said he would think this would catch up! -wi -th <br />the contractor. Commissioner Wiggins sad we are talking about a <br />year and a half from the time of inspection, not a year and a <br />half from the time the contract is awarded, but there is another <br />element gap to consider here. The people are going to continue <br />- 20 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.