My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SM 12-17-75
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1975
>
SM 12-17-75
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 9:29:04 AM
Creation date
9/20/2012 4:47:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5. OLO BUSINESS (Cont'd <br />The motion was made by Mr. Wiggins to receive the letters from <br />The Hickey Company, Inc. and Robert Foegley Landscape Design <br />and Contracting, Inc. (noted above), and to approve their re- <br />quest for extension of the time in which to award the bids to <br />February 1, 1976, and to extend the starting dates and the <br />completion dates correspondingly. The motion was seconded by <br />Mr. Donaldson and carried. <br />b. Amendment to Contract with Abstract Company of St. Joseph POST- APPROVAL, <br />County; Inc.: This is an amendment to the NDP A -10 Project CONTRACT <br />contract we have for Professional Services with-the Abstract AMENDMENT, <br />Company of St. Joseph County, Inc. and the Department of Re- NDP A -10 <br />development, dated April 6, 1973. <br />The amendment is to Paragraph 3a(1) of the Contract, and <br />amended to read as follows: <br />Mr. Steinmetz advised they are very pleased to be here and <br />that their purpose really here this morning is to bring all <br />the Commissioners up to date, as well as the News Media on <br />the progress they have been making with Block 6 and the in- <br />vestor group. Mr. Steinmetz revealed a model of the corpo- <br />ration's plan for Block 6 near downtown. <br />- 4 - <br />The Local Public Agency will pay the Contractor <br />$75.00 for each acquisition parcel upon which a <br />title policy in the amount of $2,000.00 has <br />been issued where no prior title evidence is <br />furnished by the owners. <br />Dated December 1, 1973, and signed by Mr. Horace B. <br />Clarke, President, Abstract Company of St. Joseph <br />County, Inc. <br />Mr. Brownell explained what happened is that the Abstract <br />Company increased their price $5.00 and we didn't get the <br />amendment approved by the Redevelopment Commission, and <br />this is being requested by the auditors for the close -out <br />of the NDP Project A -10. <br />Mr. Wiggins moved for the approval of the above - stated amend- <br />ment to Contract with Abstract Company of St. Joseph County, <br />Inc., dated April 6, 1973. Motion was seconded by Mr. Chenney <br />and carried. <br />c. <br />Model and Schematics presented by the St. Joseph River Bend MODEL AND <br />Development Corporation, on Disposition Parcel No. 6 -1, SCHEMATICS <br />Project Indiana R -66: The Chair recognized Mr. Lloyd S. PRESENTED <br />Taylor, spokesman for the St. Joseph River Bend Development FOR BLOCK 6 <br />Corporation, and Mr. William R. Steinmetz, President of the DEVELOPMENT, <br />Corporation. R -66 <br />Mr. Steinmetz advised they are very pleased to be here and <br />that their purpose really here this morning is to bring all <br />the Commissioners up to date, as well as the News Media on <br />the progress they have been making with Block 6 and the in- <br />vestor group. Mr. Steinmetz revealed a model of the corpo- <br />ration's plan for Block 6 near downtown. <br />- 4 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.