Laserfiche WebLink
6. OLD BUSINESS (Cont'd) <br />of the center to the entire supply of first - quality rooms <br />is not ideal, the distribution of outlying accommodations <br />is certainly within acceptable limits and not unlike that <br />existing in a number of other cities of a size comparable <br />to South Bend. <br />"It is, therefore, our conclusion that in spite of the very <br />attractive opportunity presented by the Midway Motor Lodge/ <br />Hoffman House combination that this project cannot be <br />successfully supported without adversely affecting a market <br />that is already having considerable problems." <br />Mr. Brownell advised that he discussed this letter yesterday with <br />Mr. Medlock and he is aware of this report and has been furnished <br />with a copy of the letter. <br />Motion was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Cira and carried, <br />to receive the report from Real Estate Research Corporation and place <br />on file, pending further discussions with Mr. Medlock. <br />At this point, Mr. Gordon E. Medlock, International Constructors <br />Company, arrived in the meeting and President Nimtz advised him <br />that Mr. Brownell had just read the letter from Real Estate Research <br />and that he had also advised he had discussed this letter with him. <br />The Chair also advised Mr. Medlock of the motion just made. <br />b. Report on letter dated Au ust 1, 1975, from Mr. Harrison Miller, <br />re sale of downtown property: This letter was received by Mr. F. <br />Jay Nimtz, as President of the Redevelopment Commission, just <br />prior to the Commission meeting being in session, Friday, August <br />1st meeting. The comments relating to the letter are noted in <br />the Minutes of that meeting, 8a, pp. 9, 10 and 11, and the Chair <br />had requested this item be placed on the Agenda for this meeting <br />and referred to our Commission Legal Counsel, Mr. Kevin J. Butler, <br />and Mr. Brownell, Executive Director, Department of Redevelopment, <br />for a report. Mr. Brownell read the letter in its entirety. <br />Mr. Butler advised that Mr. Nicholas C. Jannotta, with Real Estate <br />Research Corporation, has been on vacation for the past two weeks. <br />"We expect him to be visiting us next week for at least one day- - <br />possibly two - -to discuss the Parcel 6 -1 disposition, as well as <br />other disposition matters in =the downtown area, and this letter <br />will be discussed with him at that time concerning Mr. Miller's <br />recommendations, or opinion, that the one bid that we received <br />and the proposal -- redevelopment plan that is involved with that <br />bid - -that it not be approved by the Commissioners. That will be <br />discussed with Mr. Jannotta." <br />President Nimtz added, "Of course, it is my understanding from <br />our previous discussions that you [Mr. Kevin J. Butler, Commission <br />Legal Counsel] advised us some weeks ago that the bid itself, with <br />its conditions, does not meet the requirements. This is no news to <br />us here. This has been your position 'that the conditions that <br />were in the bid, that they did not meet the legal requirements.' <br />Is that right, Kevin ?" <br />REPORT ON <br />LETTER RE- <br />CEIVED FROM <br />MR. HARRISO <br />MILLER, <br />LAND SALE, <br />R-66 <br />