Laserfiche WebLink
8. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Cont'd) <br />cause other people tell-me it does work. Mr. Wilcox has assured me <br />that what he just got through making is a statement that they did <br />comedown and make the adjustment whatever it was at that time- - <br />because I °had spoken to him about it and he did get on the phone and <br />talked to Mr. Colip to take care of it, but I have not, as at this <br />time, seen the neon lighting on." Mr. Wilcox said'he was assured <br />that it will be taken care of and that he did check it for three <br />days after the men were there and the lights were on. <br />Ms. Derbeck's reference to the drinking.fountains being a news item <br />and the editorial that the Plaza is starting to drag, Mr. Butler <br />stated, "One of the specific problems, and I hope we can attempt <br />to resolve it, or in the light of the bad drinking fountains, my <br />understanding is that the Redevelopment staff'has gone from approxi- <br />mately 60 to, as about a week and a half ago, all the staff that is <br />left is five (5) members of the staff, and none of these are respon- <br />sible for that. We will have to develop a line of communication. <br />If the Department of Public Works is responsible to see that the <br />Mall is operating, we will have to develop that line of communica- <br />tions." Mrs. Allen asked why they were not developed earlier. <br />Mr. Butler said we will try to get the drinking fountains resolved, <br />and that this is the first time he is hearing this problem, with <br />Mr. Soltesz again adding that he had mentioned they were not work- <br />ing in the month of April, and it was not followed up. <br />e.1 Block 6 Bid: <br />Mr. Allen E. Schrager asked "if the Commission has decided yet, <br />whether or not to accept or reject the bid that they received <br />on Block 6, or when you intend to make such a decision ?" Presi- <br />dent Nimtz advised that no decision has been made at this time <br />and does not know when they will make that decision. Mr. Schrager <br />also asked if the Commission has been advised by our Legal Counsel <br />yet whether this bid meets the requirements of our Department and <br />HUD, and the answer by the Chair was that we have been advised <br />that there are certain specifics that are being discussed with HUD <br />and our consultants as to whether it meets the requirements, and <br />he did not know whether all of those have been ironed out or not. <br />Further questions by Mr. Schrager was, "So actually you don't know <br />at this time whether you have a good bid or you do not have a good <br />bid, or whether it qualifies or not ?" President Nimtz stated that <br />that is correct, and the opinion of our Legal Counsel right now <br />is that he feels that it does not fully qualify; that there have <br />been discussions between him and the bidder and the staff as to <br />whether it does or not as to the difference of opinion. <br />Mr. Schrager said what he is trying to find out is whether there <br />is a bid on the fire or not, and Mr. Brownell said there are <br />negotiations going on currently with the people who proposed this <br />bid to see if they have a proposal that could be accepted by this <br />Commission. Whether it would be a different proposal than the one <br />they submitted, Mr. Brownell said he hoped it would be that would <br />avoid the difficulties that we encountered with the first. <br />- 16 - <br />