Laserfiche WebLink
8. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Cont'd <br />contract provides there be a one -year maintenance on the mechanical <br />things and three years on the balance of it, and they hold the <br />subcontractor responsible. The malfunctioning of the drinking <br />fountains is within the one -year maintenance period. <br />Bill Slabaugh with the Board of Public Works verified Ed Soltesz <br />is correct on the drinking fountains; the problem did come up right <br />away, and the parts were ordered right away. On Ms. Derbeck's <br />statement that there has to be someone with the responsibility to <br />see that the things are operating, to do it and to do it now, Mr. <br />Slabaugh stated, "But that person that you are pointing a finger <br />at, better HAVE THE AUTHORITY to carry out that finger pointing <br />for the responsibility." <br />Further lengthy discussions and questions ensued with the question <br />directed to Legal Counsel by the Chair to explain-the legal ethics <br />involved on the bond plan. Mr. Butler advised that if Ideal Consoli- <br />dated cannot deliver or get delivery of the parts, through no fault <br />of their own, then we cannot enforce the maintenance bond at this <br />time. If it is a matter of Ideal simply sitting on their order of <br />April and not having taken any action subsequently, then they have <br />been dilatory. Also, at this point, if there are any other problems <br />with the Plaza, "to let us know today, so it can be taken care of. <br />I think the fountains have been taken care of - -if I am not mistaken <br />all the fountains are running, but, basically, I think that the Plaza <br />is 99% operational and a people place." <br />Constructively, Mr. Soltesz said, "I don't disagree with this. I <br />am talking on the public side of it, and I have about 4,200 retirees <br />with some of them coming downtown and asking me how do we get a drink <br />of water. It becomes a laughing stock to my piers that I have to <br />answer to also ... because I can't answer it ... because I can't speak <br />legally to them. The only thing that they want is a doggone drink <br />of water; now, isn't that ironic! And a place to sit down. And, <br />if the trees are dying, they want to know about this also. I am <br />not a horticulturist to answer why the tree is dying. What I am <br />saying here is that if we have to explain to the little people of <br />this community the legal aspects of it, then we've got it all <br />wrong... because this is not my responsibility. Being a part of <br />the public that lives in this community that tries to make it grow, <br />and I am not making a grand -stand speech about it, it is quite <br />irritative when you are out here with the people." <br />Mr. Butler said if there is any other way to repair it on a temporary <br />basis - -if Ideal feels there is another way -- then, of course, it <br />is something we can have them do. We can require them to do. <br />Mr. John R. Kagel, Executive Director, Downtown South Bend Council, <br />suggested, in the legalistic area, if possible or feasible, to have <br />the contractor put in writing what is the part, or what is the problem, <br />why the drinking fountains are not working, and have something legal <br />to work on. The comparison was made with the statement that for <br />the lack of a 10� screw, we lost a multi - million dollar rocket at one <br />time. <br />- 14 - <br />