Laserfiche WebLink
5. OLDI <br />3 <br />BUSINESS (Cont'd <br />bidder in this location. We have no way of knowing that until we <br />find out, so that might delay that part of the bid, and until then <br />there are other parts to keep us busy." <br />Report on damaged <br />grating at old Post Office <br />Building: This item <br />DAMAGED <br />was discussed <br />in prior meetings May 23, 7b; <br />June 20, 6b; July 3, <br />GRATING, <br />9 -1), and the <br />Commission in meeting of June <br />20th, requested a re- <br />OLD POST <br />port from the <br />Board of Public Works, through <br />Mr. Rollin Farrand, <br />OFFICE BLDG. <br />City Engineer, <br />who.was present. <br />R -66 <br />Mr. Brownell advised we have received a copy of letter from Mr. <br />Patrick M. McMahon, Manager, Bureau of Public Construction, dated <br />July 10, 1975, to the Board of Public Works, which states the <br />project engineer for the River Bend Plaza work called the Plant <br />Engineer, Mr. Kyle, of the Post Office. Mr. Kyle suggested turn- <br />ing the grating over, but it is rusted and the welds have broken <br />so it should be repaired or replaced. The letter further states <br />because this grating has been reported by Mr. Ed Soltesz as a <br />hazard to pedestrians, "we hereby request that the Board notify <br />Mr. Kyle, at the new Post Office, to repair or replace the grating." <br />President Nimtz asked Mr. Bill Slabaugh, with the Department of <br />Public Works, if he is involved in this grating? Mr. Slabaugh <br />advised they made it so that it is safe to walk on but didn't <br />feel the City was obliged to replace or make any beefed -up re- <br />pairs on that particular grating. He also advised their attitude <br />had been that we should have had it done at the time cif the side- <br />walk construction. To the Chair's question if the General Services <br />Administration has control over the Federal Court Building, Mr. <br />Slabaugh advised he is pretty sure they do, "because the Plant <br />Engineer for the new Post Office is also maintaining that building <br />and I guess that's one and the same boss, unless the post office <br />is renting it from a larger agency." <br />In answer to Mr. Brownell's question if it is safe the way it is, <br />Mr. Slabaugh replied, "It's safe, yes; it's still irregular. They <br />actually should change or weld it." <br />Commissioner Donaldson asked, "Has it actually been established who <br />is responsible for that grating in the first place ?" Mr. Slabaugh <br />was called by the Chair for his response, and Mr. Slabaugh advised, <br />"That is what we want the Board of Public Works to establish. I <br />asked Tom Oesterling and he said he thought it was the building <br />owner's responsibility, and the building owner said he thought it <br />was the Department of Redevelopment's responsibility. Actually, <br />when you get right down to it, they are in the public way. They <br />are encroaching in the public way with their ventilating system, <br />but, by the same token, we sort of encroached on their property <br />with the vent for the pool pit, for which we received their per- <br />mission." <br />Mr. Brownell said he believed this has been turned over to the <br />Board of P!ub1ic Works and that they now have the responsibility <br />to handle this to conclusion, "do they not ?" Mr. Slabaugh answered <br />in the affirmative. <br />- 5 - <br />