My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AM 05-23-75
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1975
>
AM 05-23-75
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 9:56:24 AM
Creation date
9/20/2012 3:08:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7. <br />E: <br />GRESS REPORTS (Cont'd) <br />Commissioner Wiggins wanted to raise one question: "In terms of <br />mechanical" what about the rocks that'are currently loose from the <br />Epoxy and the rest of it, is that mechanical? Mr. Oesterling re- <br />lied, "No, that is under the three -year guarantee." Commissioner <br />Chenney asked if those are the black rocks they are speaking of? <br />Commissioner Wiggi.ns requested if he would "change the 'black' to <br />'gray' - a kind of ''wash -out gray' a't`that`." <br />LIC HEARING <br />T is being the conclusion of the items on the Agenda for the meeting, <br />M% Brownell chaired this part of the meeting for Item 5 under Old <br />B siness, a. Plans for Building Additional Plaza between Jefferson and <br />W shington Streets, R -66: <br />T is item, by consent, was placed as the last item of the meeting to allow <br />p blic input. This was discussed in the Commission meeting of May 9, under <br />Item 5a, at length, with the motion made and carried that this item be placed <br />oi the Agenda for the May 23rd meeting for public discussion and hearing. <br />T is item was also discussed at great length in Commission Meeting of Novem- <br />b r 1, 1974, under Item 6d, Preliminary Schematic. <br />M-. Brownell said we have essentially three (3) plans that have been sug- <br />g sted by Mr. Phil Simonds, the architect with Environmental Planning and <br />D sign, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, who is doing the block between Jefferson <br />aid Washington Streets. <br />The first plan, on the wall now, indicates the hydraulic lift stage, 30 ft. <br />wide by 60 ft. long, going across the entire street. This is the one dis- <br />cussed at the Plaza Office at some length and discussed here. We agreed <br />to have this item discussed here again today so that everyone could have <br />a chance to make an input. <br />T o more plans will be placed on the wall.hE-,re- -one to show a permanent <br />s age at the side of the sidewalk and the stage being turned the other <br />w y, 30 ft. wide and 60 ft. long along the sidewalk on the east side of <br />tie street, and it would be permanent, and then it would be, as you can <br />s e, curbs 10 feet out from the stage, 6 ft. high and 10 ft. wide. A <br />1 ittle Plaza - like. <br />Tie third will be very much like the original design for the Plaza and I <br />will discuss each one. The three (3) plans are here that we are shoving <br />t is morning, and we would like to have your input. We only have three (3) <br />m mbers of the Commission here today, so probably will not resolve it today, <br />bit we will give everyone an opportunity to tell us about it and discuss it <br />a y way you wish. Is there anyone who wishes to make any comments about <br />t is plan? <br />Mr. Wilcox: A comment first. You said it has been discussed at the River <br />Bend Plaza. A motion was made, and I so informed the Commission <br />at the last meeting that this Alternate, which is 'D', I believe, <br />be accepted by this Commission, which was by unanimous vote of <br />the Committee, and I would also like to add that - -at least this <br />may be a jaundiced few - -but there are more people using the <br />- 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.