My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SM 05-09-75
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1975
>
SM 05-09-75
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 9:41:03 AM
Creation date
9/20/2012 3:04:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Cont'd <br />Ms Derbeck said regardless of which, that Terry Miller made comments in <br />bo . h . <br />Mr. C. Wayne Brownell, Executive Director, said the Chair was requesting <br />approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 18, and Terry <br />Miller's comments are shown in the April 18, 1975, Minutes, noted as <br />Item 10, Block 6 Development, R -66, pages 12 through 15. <br />The Chair requested extra copies of the Minutes of April 18 be brought <br />in the meeting for discussion, for the Commissioners and News Media, <br />and this was done. <br />Mr. Brownell said the Commission was about to approve the Minutes of <br />the Regular Meeting of April 18 and if Ms. Derbeck has any corrections <br />for that meeting? Ms. Derbeck replied, "I have none for the 18th. The <br />180 is okay; I am talking about the Minutes of the 29th meeting." Mr. <br />Brownell said we are talking about the 18th, and that we should take <br />that one first. <br />Pre�ident Nimtz said: <br />Ms. <br />On Miller's remarks, there are four (4) pages of Terry Miller's <br />remarks in the Minutes of the April 18th meeting. <br />Of course... I'd say this to everybody present... it's impossible <br />to have verbatim Minutes of these meetings. Helen is good, <br />and I think she is studying to be a court reporter, but, for <br />the record, we are just not equipped - -or available - -to have <br />verbatim Minutes of these meetings, and we try to do the best <br />on digest. But, I think your comments might be apropos for the <br />29th Minutes. We will get into that on the Minutes of the <br />29th. But, I think, on the 18th Minutes, that everything is <br />there. Are there any comments from the Commissioners? <br />lissioner Wiggins: <br />Well, I agree with what you say. I think that we ought to be <br />completely fair and objective about this. We operate under <br />the Roberts Rules of Order, and it's required that we - -that <br />the minutes -- reflect the actions that are proposed and are taken, <br />and, I believe, that they do that. It's not required that the <br />Minutes be a verbatim account of everything that's said, and <br />everything that's happened to that degree. As long as the <br />Minutes reflect reasonable accuracy as to what did transpire, <br />in terms of the actions that were taken, is all that is neces- <br />sary. <br />Derbeck: <br />Well, I don't think they should be verbatim either, but perhaps <br />things need to be referred to, and that as our City Councilman, <br />Terry Miller has requested information to his questions <br />- 3 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.