|
5. ODD BUSINESS (Cont'd
<br />d Final Pay
<br />Estimate No. 10 and Final
<br />Acceptance
<br />to Morse
<br />FINAL PAY
<br />Electric
<br />Company, on Contract Phase
<br />II -D, R -66:
<br />Commis-
<br />ESTIMATE NO. 10
<br />sion consideration was requested to
<br />approve Final
<br />Pay
<br />& FINAL ACCEPT -
<br />Estimate
<br />No. 10 and Final Acceptance, to Morse
<br />Electric
<br />ANCE APPROVED,
<br />Company,
<br />for balance of $20,438.73,
<br />Phase II -D,
<br />Project
<br />CONTRACT PHASE
<br />Indiana
<br />R -66.
<br />II -D, R -66
<br />Mr. Brownell read the letter from Mr. Thomas A. Oesterling,
<br />P.E., Clyde E. Williams & Associates, Inc., Engineering
<br />Consultants for the R -66 Project, dated March 19, 1975,
<br />which states that pursuant to a March 11 final inspec-
<br />tion of this project by Ralph Wadzinski of the Bureau of
<br />Traffic and Lighting, Robert Urbanski of Morse Electric
<br />Company, and Kenneth Herceg of Clyde E. Williams & Associ-
<br />ates, it has been agreed and substantiated that the Phase
<br />II -D Contract has been satisfactorily completed according
<br />to the contract plans and specifications.
<br />It is the recommendation of Clyde E. Williams & Associates
<br />that this final payment be made and that the official date
<br />of final acceptance of this completed project be March 11,
<br />1975. The Contract Performance and Payment Bond (CP -1
<br />thru CP -3 of the Contract Documents) must remain in force
<br />for the stated period of 24 months from the date of final
<br />acceptance.
<br />It is also recommended that the Morse Electric Company
<br />be required to present the "Contractor's Certificate
<br />and Release" duly sworn and notarized, concurrent with
<br />the release of the check for final payment.
<br />On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Donaldson and
<br />carried, Final Pay Estimate No. 10 and Final Acceptance
<br />to Morse Electric Company for balance of $20,438.73, was
<br />approved on Contract Phase II -D, Project Indiana R -66.
<br />e Plaza Park Contract No. 1, R -66: Commission authoriza- PLAZA PARK
<br />tion was requested to reject the bids received on Plaza CONTRACT NO. 1,
<br />Park Contract No. 1, and rescind the conditional award BIDS REJECTED,
<br />by the Redevelopment Commission, of Plaza Park Contract CONDITIONAL
<br />No. 1, to Arco Engineering Construction Corporation, in AWARD RESCINDED,
<br />amount of $240,322.63, as proposed, (Base bid amount of & APPROVAL TO
<br />$277,555.57, with Alternates "A" through "M" amounting RE- ADVERTISE,
<br />to $35,917.85, totalling: $240,322.63), which was R -66
<br />awarded subject to HUD approval and Commission Legal
<br />Counsel approval.
<br />Mr. Brownell mentioned the
<br />subject and again read the
<br />ary 11, 1975, in which they
<br />our award of Contract No. 1
<br />tion Corporation, in amount
<br />reasons:
<br />previous discussion on this
<br />letter from HUD, dated Febru-
<br />stated they cannot concur in
<br />to Arco Engineering Construc-
<br />of $240,322.63, for two
<br />- 7 -
<br />
|