Laserfiche WebLink
NEW-BUSINESS (Cont'd) <br />built" warted so that the project is, decreased i,n the <br />cost amount of.$32,292.94, The detail is notEd in <br />the change order and the items and overruns are ex- <br />plained. <br />Per Legal Counsel's question, Mr.. Oesterling advised <br />there are no outstanding claims or liens. These have <br />all been checked out. <br />On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Wade and unani- <br />mously carried, Change Order No. 10 to Phase II -C, for <br />a decrease in contract amount of.$32,292.94, was approved, <br />with. a "vote of thanks" to our consultant engineer for <br />getting the decrease. <br />.......... .... <br />c. Change Order No.'2 to_Phase'II =D; R -66: Authorization CHANGE ORDER NO. <br />for this Change Order, with Morse Electric Company, 2 TO PHASE II -D <br />Inc., was requested, for an increase in contract amount APPROVED, R -66 <br />of $24,375.55, Project Indiana R -66. <br />This item also was discussed in the earlier session. <br />Mr.Tom Oesteriing had advised this is our Signaliza.- <br />tion Contract with Morse Electric that was started in <br />June of 1972, and was written with the understanding <br />the contractor would do his work with other phases of <br />the downtown urban renewal. Thcre were many changes- - <br />one a change in the over -all concept of the superblock <br />plan, changing Jefferson Boulevard to a two -way from <br />one -way construction, causing signal changes to amend <br />the situation. <br />Mr. Ken Herceg, presently with Clyde E. Williams (prior <br />with City Engineer's office), advised that $17,000 out of <br />the above amount is the difference in the superblock <br />concept -- making the major difference. These are for the <br />basic changes for the cables and allowances to change to <br />the other system are the major overruns - -some were due <br />to delays. <br />On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Wade and unani- <br />mously carried, Change Order No. 2 to Phase II-D, for an <br />increase in contract amount of $24,375.55, was approved <br />subject to Legal Counsel and HUD approval. <br />_.._._.. _. ... ._. ................ ... I.... <br />d. Project RENEW; Inc. Contract: Commission approval was PROJECT RENEW, <br />requested to enter into contract with Project RENEW, INC. INC. CONTRACT <br />to rehabilitate the home on 1408 South Rush Street, APPROVED, E -7 <br />Project Tndiana E -7, Project RENEW, Inc. has applied for <br />and been awarded a grant by the: Department of Redevelopment <br />under its E -7 Neighborhood Development Program. This is <br />in accordance with the "Guidelines for Non- Profit Groups" <br />established by this Commission. <br />- 10 - <br />