My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 05-03-74
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1974
>
RM 05-03-74
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 10:12:28 AM
Creation date
9/20/2012 12:09:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. COMMUNICATIONS (Cont'd <br />I <br />on yo r car - this guarantee is absolute for five years regardless <br />of pr )blems -with replacement at no cost to the 'owners'. Mr. <br />Helmei said he gathered the truss paving is an alternate and he <br />wonde ed whether the alternate was as good as the original. Mr. <br />Akin tated that they have exactly what they intended to get to <br />do this paving and the error (as stated in Mr. Werley's letter) <br />was that EPD did not modify the written specs after selecting an <br />alter ate paver. Mr. Helmen asked "What is the cost "? Mr. Akin <br />stated that we have what was recommended by the joint venture, we <br />do not have a substitute at less cost. <br />Mr. L nnon stated that the specs that were written is what we now <br />have. We have the option to accept the substitute which is equal <br />to or more than what was originally the intent of the specifications. <br />Mr. H linen asked about the difference between extruded and pressed <br />brick Mr. Lennon said that extruded brick comes out of a form - <br />is pu hed out and pressed brick is squeezed out and sliced off. Mr. <br />Helmer asked if we are getting what the specs called for.. Mr. Akin <br />said there is no real problem with the bricks - these are stronger <br />and m (re durable. Mr. Wiggins asked if we are correcting the error <br />of so eone who write the specs and Mr. Lennon said "Exactly ". <br />Mr. Wiggins moved to accept the modification and place letter on <br />file. Mr. Chenney seconded—motion passed unanimously. <br />b. HUD letter dated April 19, 1974: This letter, over <br />the signature of Daniel B. Bowman, Technical Services Branch, related <br />to the wage decision for Project Ind. E -6, copy of the decision was <br />attached. <br />C. Hickey Co., Inc. letter dated April 23, 1974: This letter <br />over he signature of James T. Zakrocki, Project Manager, concerns <br />the lift gate at Walker's Shoes (River Bend Plaza). <br />over <br />Jeffe <br />over <br />Plaza <br />signa <br />advis <br />Water <br />signat <br />Sectio <br />III of <br />WAGE DECISION <br />IND. E -6 <br />WALKER SHOES <br />LIFT GATE <br />R -66 <br />Hickey <br />Co, <br />Inc. letter dated April 24, 1974: This letter <br />JEFFERSON BLVD. <br />e signature <br />of <br />Mr. Zakrocki, concerns extra work to be done on <br />ADD'L WORK <br />on Blvd. <br />R -66 <br />Hickey <br />Co., <br />Inc. letter dated April 25, 1974: This letter, <br />PAVING - PLAZA <br />e signature <br />of <br />Mr. Zakrocki, concerns paving pattern for the <br />R -66 <br />per letter from Hastings Pavement Company). <br />HUD letter dated April 26, 1974: This letter, over the C.O. #3, WATER <br />re of Mark Griffin, Chief, Architectural and Engineering Section, FORCE ACCT. <br />concurrence on Change Order No. 3, Bureau of Water Supply, PHASE III -R -66 <br />orce Account on Phase III, Project Ind. R -66. <br />I. HUD letter dated April 26, 1974: This letter, over the C.O. #10 TO <br />ire of Mark L. Griffin, Chief, Architectural and Engineering CONTRACT #5 - <br />i, advises concurrence on Change Order #10, Contract #5, Phase PHASE III, R -66 <br />Project Ind. R -66. <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.