My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 09-01-72
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1972
>
RM 09-01-72
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 10:33:28 AM
Creation date
9/12/2012 1:14:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd) <br />2) Location of 48" sewer at Michigan and LaSalle <br />Streets in error on City Engineering plans. <br />Requires modification of manhole and 12 linear <br />feet of pipe. <br />3) Demolition of vaults at Michigan and Monroe <br />segment of new U.S. 31 construction added to <br />this contract so construction bond will cover <br />the subgrade. <br />4) Mall influenced design changes and driveway <br />entrance changes. <br />5) Additional borrow to replace common excava- <br />tion, 3,168 cubic yards O $2.35. <br />6) Extra manhole constructed, in lieu of relo- <br />cating Bell Telephone manhole. <br />On m tion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney, Change <br />Order No. 3 to Phase II -B, Part A & B, was approved for <br />an increase in contract amount of $12,447.57. Motion unani- <br />mously carried. <br />Mr. Wiggins asked in terms of scheduling the paving of <br />Service Drives, how that fits in.our schedule? Mr. Sla- <br />baug advised the plans are to be completed in October <br />to a vertise the Mall. Everything should be done under <br />Mall area under II -C Service Drive Contract, ready for <br />Commission approval in November for bid advertising. The <br />Mall construction contract will be let in January. In <br />reference to the parcels purchased by A.G.A. Realty Com- <br />pany in this Commission meeting, the demolition contractor <br />was cbligated to haul in fill dirt and there was nothing to <br />retain that fill dirt - -20 to 26 feet of fill without a re- <br />taining wall. If it is washed in, it will have to be dug <br />out tefore footings can be put in. It was agreed the <br />buil er is to put his wall in. Technically, we are not <br />supposed to leave an empty basement and technically we <br />cann t construct a wall to retain an alley, because it is <br />supposed to be a filled basement. This is supposed to be <br />work Ed out between this group and Glasers. <br />Mr. Wiggins referred to this as a mutual accommodation. <br />I. <br />Construction <br />Change Order No. <br />Co., Inc., <br />Change Order for an <br />1 to Contract with Rieth -Riley <br />E -5: Approval was requested for <br />increase in contract amount of <br />CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 <br />TO CONTRACT WITH RIETH- <br />RILEY CONSTRUCTION CO., <br />this <br />$2,4 <br />0.00, for 160 square yards of additional reconstruc- <br />INC. APPROVED, E -5 <br />ted concrete <br />sidewalk, in <br />the Model Cities East Code En- <br />forc <br />ment Project, E -5. <br />Fourteen days are to be added to <br />the domDletion <br />time for <br />this additional work. <br />SM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.