My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 12-17-71
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1971
>
RM 12-17-71
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 10:43:57 AM
Creation date
9/11/2012 4:11:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6. IEW BUSINESS (Cont'd <br />service drives will be in the next contract with storm <br />sewe s- -the Contract for Phase II -C. The paving of <br />the iew St. Joseph Street will probably not begin be- <br />fore summer. <br />Mr. Wiggins asked about the time frame. Mr. Muggy said <br />the Colfax Bridge will be out of service for about six <br />months, from the time Phase I will be completed and he <br />anticipated this to be in the vicinity of June. Colfax <br />and Jefferson cannot be closed off at the same time. <br />Prot cted concrete work is the only activity being <br />purs ed during the winter season on Phase I. <br />Mr. Wiggins further asked if the contractors would be <br />in,,-,,each other's way. Mr. Muggy said there should be no <br />conf ict. The retaining wall will be completed by March; <br />Phase II -B construction will not start until weather <br />perm ts-- possibly April. By this time, Howell Construc- <br />tion Company should be out. <br />Mr. fammerschmidt asked if the contractors will be in <br />conf ict on the bridge and St. Joseph Street? Mr. Muggy <br />advi ed the bridge contractor must put in the last piece <br />of tie retaining wall -- combination of retaining wall and <br />brid a abutment. Work on bridge is not in conflict with <br />Arco <br />Mr. Kagel said he has a human econometrics problem as <br />related to the downtown business community. He requested <br />a flow chart -- concerned about Easter, Mothers Day, etc.- - <br />to d scuss with the engineers,. Mr. Muggy agreed to do so. <br />Mr. iggins made the motion we accept the recommendation of our <br />cons ltant to award the bids to the lowest bidders: <br />Contract <br />II -B <br />Contractor <br />Bid Amount <br />Part <br />"A" <br />Arco Engineering Construction <br />Corp. <br />$472,175.80 <br />Part <br />"B" <br />Arco Engineering Construction <br />Corp. <br />86,832.95 <br />Part <br />"C" <br />Rieth -Riley Construction Co., <br />Inc. <br />299,978.42 <br />Adde <br />dum No. 1 <br />Rieth - Riley Construction Co., <br />Inc. <br />28,000.00 <br />subj <br />ct to HUD <br />concurrence. Motion seconded by Mr. <br />Chenney, and <br />unan <br />mously carried. <br />The c <br />Mr. P <br />will <br />unti <br />plisi <br />uestion was raised if Colfax is not opened as scheduled, <br />uggy advised when Phase II -B is completed, Michigan Street <br />be cut off and LaSalle and Jefferson will have to be used <br />Colfax is completed. Temporary surfacing could be accom- <br />ed to put the street into service until spring. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.