My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 11-05-71
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1971
>
RM 11-05-71
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 10:45:02 AM
Creation date
9/11/2012 4:01:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5. QLD BUSINESS (Cont'd <br />"The best thing, I believe, would be to follow the <br />advice of the experts." <br />Rev. Williams: <br />My comments would be repetitious of Mr. Wiggins' and <br />Mr. Wade's." <br />Mr. Chen <br />''I agree with the recommendation. <br />My comment is to support the professional consultants', <br />Simonds and Simonds, recommendation. We should open <br />up the intersections and penetrations of streets of the <br />Mall in two places. The intersection will virtually <br />have to be an obstacle.course to really slow down traffic <br />for the protection of-the pedestrians.. We will have to <br />urge Simonds for the treatment of the two intersections <br />so that the pedestrian will be protected at all times. <br />I will support the recommendation of Simonds and <br />Simonds." <br />President Helmen said the.moti.on is for the limited penetra- <br />tion of the Mall on_Washington Street and Jefferson Boulevard, <br />and the pedestrians are to have unrestricted use of the Mall. <br />Also the motion,is to include the acceptance of the Preliminary <br />Plans, with the amendments, and to proceed with the final plans <br />with Simonds and Simonds, Professional Consultants, Pittsburgh, <br />Pa. Saod motion was made by.Mr. Chenney, seconded by Rev. <br />Williams, and unanimously carried by.all Commissioners. <br />6. �EW BUSINESS <br />E. Amendatory Application Consultant, R -66: This item CONSULTANT SERVICES <br />wast bled by Commission. FOR AMENDATORY APPLI- <br />CATION TABLED, R -66 <br />t. Raceway and River Beautification, R -66: Mr. Barbe <br />requested Commission authority to take proposals for a Con- PROPOSALS FOR CONSUL - <br />sult nt to design the beautification of the Raceway and per- TANT & APPLICATION SUB - <br />mission to develop and submit an application for river beauti- MITTAL FOR URBAN <br />fica ion funds. He said the Raceway needs some drainage, fill BEAUTIFICATION PROGRAM <br />and some landscaping. The water is stagnant in it now and it FUNDS AUTHORIZED, R -66 <br />should be moving through it. It is contemplated that the <br />Raceway remain there and the water flow.through it. Money is <br />available for this project. <br />Mr. Wiggins moved for the authorization of the proposals, and <br />permission to submit an. application for funds through the <br />urban beautification program. Said motion seconded by Rev. <br />Williams and.unanimously carried. <br />E-11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.