7. NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd
<br />On motion by Mr. Chenney, seconded -by Mr. Wiggins; the
<br />above- stated grants were authorized and motion unanimously
<br />carried.
<br />h. Option Agreement, R-66 Approval and. >authori,, -ONE ;(l) OPTION AGREE -
<br />zation was requested for the President to sign one (,I)- MENT APPROVED, PARCEL
<br />Option Agreement, in the Central Downtown Urban Renewal NO. 9 -31, R -66
<br />Projec , R -66, for Parcel 9 -31, located at 113 S. Michi-
<br />gan St eet.
<br />On motion; by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Rev. Williams, the
<br />above - stated! Option Agreement was approved and the Presi-
<br />dent authorized to sign. Motion carried unanimously.
<br />i. Change Order No. l to Demolition Contract No. CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
<br />7 -A: Approval was requested for t.1a C .ange Order TO DEMOLITION CON -
<br />with Midwest Demolftion Corporation 'for. s:idewa,l;ks ,,to TRACT NO. 7=-A
<br />be removed for the Tel ephone.Company- to ,do the,pre.4 APPROVED, R -456
<br />liminary work, for an increase in contract price of
<br />$315.00, wf.th no change in time, in the Central Down-
<br />town Urban Renewal Project, R-66
<br />On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney,
<br />Change Order No. 1 to Demolitfon.Contract'No.. 7-A
<br />was ap rove.d,.and unanimously carri °.ed.
<br />j. Resolution No. 365;. This; Resolution approves. RESQLUTION N.O. 3.65.
<br />filing an appl i cati:on undertak-tng s=urveys; and plans_: for APPROVED, MODEL
<br />an Urban Renewal Project known as the Model Ne- ighborh.00d`-NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT
<br />Project No. 1. This Resolution was presented to the NO. 1
<br />Common Council, i:n a Special Meeting ,on Tfwrsday` evening,
<br />June 1 , 1971, and approved by vote 'of :7 to O.
<br />Mr. Mike Obri'nger, Model Cities Planner, explained this
<br />is an 8.3 million renewal project, which covers approxi-
<br />mately 100 acres and fs predominately a clearance project?
<br />bounded by Olive Street, the Penn Central tracks, Walnut
<br />Street and Kenwood Street. The survey and planning is es:tt-�-
<br />mated to cost approximately $412,706. About 40% of the. area
<br />is in the street right -of -way. Approximately-22% is sub-
<br />standay d, 33% has major deficienc- ies,- 36 %!monor deffc%encies,,
<br />and about 9% is sound.
<br />On motion by Mr. Chenney, seconded by_Mr. Wiggins, Resolu-
<br />tion
<br />N . 365 was adopted .and approved unantmousIr.. -
<br />k,
<br />the ac(
<br />Church,
<br />of Was[
<br />and the
<br />title 1
<br />Resolution No. 366: .This Reso•1uton : auth_or zes RESOLUTION NO. 36:6
<br />eptance of bids for Parcel Nos. 28-27 and:28.t28,,. APPROVED, PARCEL NOS.
<br />of God in Christ, -,l oca; t'ed, on the Northeast corner, _ 28 -<27. & 28-28, R -67
<br />ington and Illinois Street intersection, R =57,
<br />execution of warranty deeds for the transfer of
<br />hereto.
<br />so
<br />
|