Laserfiche WebLink
3. PPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Cont'd) <br />REIM3URSEMENT TO REVOLVING FUND <br />roject Expenditures Account, Ind. R -56 <br />roject Expenditures Account, Ind. R -57 <br />roject Expenditures Account, Ind. R -66 <br />4. ICOMMUNICATIONS <br />$ 388.16 <br />4,887.32 <br />8,644.29 <br />Total $ 13,919.77 <br />a. HUD letter dated February 10, 1971: Mr. Steven <br />J. Hans, Assistant Regional Administrator for Renewal <br />Assistance, HUD, in Chicago, advised the Project Capital <br />Grant Progress Payment has been approved in the amount <br />of $ 1,630,872, and also that the requisition for the <br />Relo ation Grant Payment has been approved in the amount <br />of $108,916. The check has since been received. <br />5. DLD BUSINESS <br />one. <br />6. NEW BUSINESS <br />PROJECT CAPITAL GRANT <br />PROGRESS PAYMENT AND <br />RELOCATION GRANT PAYMENT <br />APPROVED, R -66 <br />arcel No. <br />Address- <br />2 -9 <br />a. The advertisement for the demolition of <br />the <br />DEMOLITION CONTRACT <br />foll <br />wing buildings and structures, within the Central <br />7 -10 <br />NO. 9 AWARDED, CENTRAL <br />Downtown <br />Urban Renewal Project, R -66, appeared in <br />The <br />DOWNTOWN URBAN RENE,4AL <br />Soutl <br />Bend Tribune on January 25 and February 1, <br />1971; <br />PROJECT, R -66 <br />in t <br />e Tri- County News on January 29, 1971, with <br />a bid <br />L.W.E. <br />open'ng <br />date of February 17, 1971, at 1:00 P.M., <br />E.S.T., <br />7 -14 <br />in t <br />is office: <br />7 -14 <br />527 <br />arcel No. <br />Address- <br />2 -9 <br />419 <br />S. Michigan Street <br />7 -10 <br />434 <br />S. Fellows Street <br />7 -10 <br />434 -1/2 S. Fellows Street <br />7 -10 <br />442 <br />S. Fellows Street <br />7 -10 <br />444 <br />S. Fellows Street <br />7 -10 <br />511 <br />E. Monroe Street <br />7 -16 <br />563 <br />L.W.E. <br />8 -6 <br />552 <br />L.W.E. <br />7 -14 <br />556 <br />L.W.E. <br />7 -14 <br />527 <br />E. Monroe Street <br />7 -4 <br />318 <br />Columbia Street <br />Eigh (8) firms submitted bids, out of twelve (12) who <br />rece ved plans, and their bids were: <br />-4- <br />