Laserfiche WebLink
6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont <br />Mr. H lmen raised the question on the architectural <br />desigi firm, for the pedestrian mall design, and the <br />Techn cal Design Committed, `ais t whether ;th�r will'' r "' <br />be hired locally? Mr. Ebel alppTi'sed the ''@e'tign' 'fi r► ' <br />hired may be local al so,f and that tha Technical Desi�� <br />Committee is a Committee °dn 'call wW06eeded'by th+e <br />Review Board and will be comprised of local profes- <br />.siona s:; whereas the architect for the mall design <br />mob a- lodal`- 'architect =a at Lad, with `t , �F f6iial <br />f�tlir it#t proven pedestrfaii mialI design' experience <br />Mr. W l helm asked if theae is a provision 1 n oar app ;' <br />prove budget for this purpose, and thle retaining fee <br />of $5(.00, plus compensa�fon wtien oaf'led.on, how. 1-ong <br />this ill go on-- whether it 1s for the ` fife -.of the <br />proje t, and whether the $50.00 monthly retainer will <br />compe sate for the time? Mr. Barbe apprised provisions <br />are i cluded in the budget, and that when the Committee <br />-5- <br />downtown area with primary emphasis drr the <br />preparation of preliminary desi gnssarid sche- <br />matics for the pedestrian mtil area. <br />2) <br />Fol l ow€�ng approval 'of the pre imi' nary design , ;, <br />` <br />prepare final drawings -`for thi construction <br />and improvement of the mall area and super- <br />vise inspection durirg.construction. <br />., <br />The Redevelopment <br />Commission wi'fljhave the same rla- <br />M1, <br />ti ons hi <br />p with this firm as `atn Jo r tl.tett has with <br />w Jr'`( <br />an architect <br />in the private s'e t6 t" <br />The Architectural <br />Design firm 'Wil l be 4esponil ble for <br />the detail <br />design and preparation of working ~drawings ' <br />°' <br />forte <br />single most important component of the Re <br />development <br />Plan. The Urban Design •CoimnT.ttee, on <br />the ot <br />her hand, wi 11 not be charge- th .any speci fi`c <br />proje <br />t or single element 'bf 'the plih:,: tint ;wifll pro- <br />vide cesign <br />continuity and general guidelines for all <br />physical <br />improvements taking place anywhere within y <br />the project <br />1 <br />area. <br />�-z . . <br />F <br />Mr. Bellinger <br />a apprised the Revi *w hoard's recomrenda- <br />PP <br />d <br />ti on is <br />passed on to the COiIM?t - 10 r, ,a n the Techni= y <br />cal D <br />s g Commi t t e e woul d 'an' -we'r' que1st1 orfi rai sed <br />by the <br />Review Board. The" groups 'v►'i 11 'e working{ <br />`. <br />together <br />simultaneously as re t' 'Thee' Redevelop - <br />ment <br />ommissi on will analyze 'arr`d 'review -the 'proposed <br />devel <br />pments and determine which �►i11 r`tiirf de,. 'tlt±e <br />R <br />maxim <br />benefit. Two 6r' 'tfirde p 6'056sed die�Yelopments ' 4 <br />are +isioned <br />for some disosTtidn' parcels. ' = r' `' <br />', <br />Mr. H lmen raised the question on the architectural <br />desigi firm, for the pedestrian mall design, and the <br />Techn cal Design Committed, `ais t whether ;th�r will'' r "' <br />be hired locally? Mr. Ebel alppTi'sed the ''@e'tign' 'fi r► ' <br />hired may be local al so,f and that tha Technical Desi�� <br />Committee is a Committee °dn 'call wW06eeded'by th+e <br />Review Board and will be comprised of local profes- <br />.siona s:; whereas the architect for the mall design <br />mob a- lodal`- 'architect =a at Lad, with `t , �F f6iial <br />f�tlir it#t proven pedestrfaii mialI design' experience <br />Mr. W l helm asked if theae is a provision 1 n oar app ;' <br />prove budget for this purpose, and thle retaining fee <br />of $5(.00, plus compensa�fon wtien oaf'led.on, how. 1-ong <br />this ill go on-- whether it 1s for the ` fife -.of the <br />proje t, and whether the $50.00 monthly retainer will <br />compe sate for the time? Mr. Barbe apprised provisions <br />are i cluded in the budget, and that when the Committee <br />-5- <br />