Laserfiche WebLink
The C <br />from <br />Parce <br />Post <br />that <br />,Post <br />to co <br />newal <br />racy <br />The s <br />posit <br />28, 1 <br />_who a <br />alter <br />to Di <br />Auth{ <br />Reg i <br />appr <br />by M <br />With <br />Chen <br />adjo <br />Dated this 27th day of August_, 196 <br />CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: <br />I, John E. Chenney, Secretary of the City of South Bend Redevelop- <br />ment Commission, Governing Body of the City of South Bend, Depart- <br />ment of Redevelopment, hereby certify that on the 27th day of August, <br />1969, I served a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Special Meeting <br />on-each and every.C.ommissioner.ofthe South Bend Redevelopment Com- <br />mission, Governing -;Body of the City .of South Bend; Department of Re- <br />development., in the following manner: by telephone and by hand de- <br />livery. <br />. ,,, Secretary. <br />(SEAL) <br />immission 'reviewed a letter dated July. 28, 1969, which was received <br />:he Post Office Department stating-: our proposed disposition price for <br />No. 10 -1, at $1.96 per square foot, was found unacceptable by the <br />lffice Department:. The.Post,Office Department has taken the position <br />finless the disposition price of Parcel No. 10 -1 can be lowered, the <br />lffice Department will have to defer and _ possibly abandon.their plans <br />istruct a new post office facility in the Central Downtown Urban Re- <br />area. The - Commission had directed the staff to_investigate.the accu- <br />)f the Post Office Department's position identified in subject letter. <br />:aff reported that information received from Washington supported the <br />ion of the Post Office Department, as cited in the letter dated July <br />169. Thestaff investigated this problem with the reuse. appraisers <br />)reed to-re-evaluate Disposition Parcel No. 10 -1, based on a-different <br />late reuse base. A price of.$1.50:per square foot has now been assigned <br />;position Parcel No. 10 -1. <br />^ization was: requested to submit this concurred -in value to the Chicago <br />ial Office of the Department of Housing and Urban Development for their <br />val. Mr. Wilhelm made.a,motion for such concurrence and it was seconded <br />Chenney. The motion was carried with a unanimous vote. <br />the conclusion of the business for which this meeting was called, Mr. <br />ay made:a:imotion for adjournment, seconded Rev. Williams. Meeting <br />rned at 4:45 'P.M. <br />e <br />/ccrec .i �c 'G,� --� <br />linger, txecutixw uirector fonara A. wiggins, <br />-2- <br />