Laserfiche WebLink
South Benc. Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting — August 28, 2012 <br />2. NEW 13USINESS <br />A. S uth Side Development Area <br />(1 continued... <br />barriers would be installed. The <br />traffic now is so bad that she can't <br />sleep at night. Mr. Durr explained <br />that under Option A her home would <br />be further away from the road. With <br />options B and D the majority of the <br />traffic is going up the new Walter <br />Street to Barbie, not on Fellows, so <br />she should see a reduction in traffic. <br />A gentleman likes Option C for that <br />reason alone. <br />Woman asked if sidewalks would be <br />put in with the Option C plan. Mr. <br />Durr said there is a plan all ready to <br />go to have a bike path extend from <br />Miami to Fellows. Mr. Schalliol <br />added that one of the acquisition <br />issues the city has' with C is that to get <br />from Fellows to Michigan, we'd have <br />to do property acquisition to put a <br />sidewalk in on the north side of <br />Ireland. One of the pieces that the <br />city doesn't have as a cost in there is <br />the right of way acquisition necessary <br />for the sidewalk all the way on the <br />north side of Ireland. <br />Woman says she doesn't understand <br />any of this and she doesn't care about <br />anything else. All she knows that she <br />may or may not lose her house. Can <br />someone tell her whether they will be <br />losing their homes? <br />Gentleman took objection to her <br />saying safety wasn't an issue she was <br />concerned about. He is most <br />concerned about the safety of <br />Isi <br />