Laserfiche WebLink
3. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Cont'd) <br />South <br />Bend Rubber Stamp Co. <br />BID; PUBLIC OFFERING <br />$ 15.25 <br />G. <br />B. Watkin <br />wat r <br />47.60 <br />North <br />Central Regional NAHRO Conference" <br />Offering No. 2, for the LaSalle Park Urban <br />50.00 <br />Renewal <br />Project, R -57. They bid for a total of 16 <br />Total <br />$ 8, 8�9.5f <br />REDEVELOPMENT <br />DISTRICT CAPITAL FUND <br />,stated <br />that the security deposit is normally -forfeited <br />North <br />Central Appraisal.Company, Inc. <br />_ <br />750.00 <br />. Bell Aluminum Sales, Inc. was collaborat- <br />Total <br />; , . $ 750.0U <br />URBAN <br />tEDEVELOPMENT FUND <br />Bell Aluminum Sales, Inc., and the withdrawal' <br />.is requested <br />Ho <br />sing Authority of City.,of South Bend, Ind. <br />.and find, <br />90.00 <br />Ke <br />th E. Proud <br />-. <br />15:00 <br />from the <br />Commission for their decision as to whether <br />:Total <br />105.00 <br />the withdrawal and refund of bid deposit - equal' <br />GRANDJOTAL <br />$ 62,321.62 <br />4. COMMUNICATIONS <br />posliti <br />n of the parcels may be possible without further <br />a. <br />HUD Letter Dated Ma`•15 1969: This letter <br />,:AUDIT <br />APPROVAL, <br />approves <br />the final audit report -on the Chapin Street -, <br />CHAPIN <br />STREET URBAN <br />Urban <br />Oenewal Project, R- 29,•4nd the only remaining° <br />_!, RENEWAL PROJECT, <br />action <br />involves the approval,of HUD -6202 forms cur- <br />R -29 <br />rently under their review. -This closes the file on <br />the Ch pin Street Urban Renewal Project, R -29, final <br />audit. <br />b. <br />Bell Aluminum Sales, Inc. Letter Received <br />BID; PUBLIC OFFERING <br />Ma 26 <br />1969: This letter is a request for the <br />NO 2'LASALLE °PARK <br />wat r <br />wa of their bid, awarded on the six parcels, <br />URBAN RENEWAL`PROJECT, <br />.in Public <br />Offering No. 2, for the LaSalle Park Urban <br />R -57 <br />Renewal <br />Project, R -57. They bid for a total of 16 <br />= <br />parcels, <br />or a total package of $11,889. Mr. Bellinger <br />,stated <br />that the security deposit is normally -forfeited <br />when a <br />contractor requests their bid be withdrawn after <br />.- <br />bid opening. <br />. Bell Aluminum Sales, Inc. was collaborat- <br />.,ing wi <br />h Charles Howell. However, the bid is in the <br />.name oi <br />Bell Aluminum Sales, Inc., and the withdrawal' <br />.is requested <br />since they have reviewed their position <br />.and find, <br />at this time, a lack of resources to meet <br />.construction <br />requirements. Authorization was requested` <br />from the <br />Commission for their decision as to whether <br />to accept <br />the withdrawal and refund of bid deposit - equal' <br />to 10% <br />of the cost of the parcels. It was believed dis- <br />posliti <br />n of the parcels may be possible without further <br />expense; <br />if not, it would be necessary to re- advertise. <br />- <br />Mr., Hel <br />en stated it would be in order to refund the <br />money if <br />it did not involve any out -of- pocket expense. <br />a,a <br />