My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 11-07-63
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1960-1969
>
1963
>
RM 11-07-63
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 3:04:01 PM
Creation date
9/6/2012 12:39:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
III. A PROVAL OF BILLS - Continued <br />Indiana <br />& Michigan Electric Co. <br />17.74 <br />G. E. Meyer <br />& Son, Inc. <br />18..78 <br />Pence - Dickens <br />Co. <br />11,.15 <br />Granville <br />P. Ziegler, Postmaster <br />50,.00 <br />Payroll <br />- November 1 to November 15, 1963 <br />21084.99 <br />Total <br />$2,603.98 <br />URBAN REDEVELOPMENT <br />FUND <br />J. Barany Agency <br />4..00 <br />Michael <br />Eva E. Kroft <br />- Reimbursement for Recording & Auditing <br />Fees for <br />Deeds and Affidavits for R -29 <br />16.70 <br />Steve L <br />pa and Son Moving Co. <br />25.00 <br />Voorhee <br />-Jontz Lumber Co. <br />Total <br />$48.35 <br />GRAND TOTAL $42,217.93 <br />IV. ELIGIBILITY SURVEY INDIANA R -41 <br />Mr. Sucher presented to the Commission two contract proposals for. <br />an eligibility study in the LaSalle Park Area Indiana R -41, the <br />work to be performed by either firm to be the same,as provided in <br />their proposals. <br />The Conmissioners were of the opinion that the difference of $50.00 <br />between the proposals should not govern the selection of the firm. <br />-,In letting out the contract, the Commission was of the opinion that <br />the selection of the Detroit firm would give them a totally dis- <br />interested and unprejudged report of the area. After full discuss - <br />ion of loth firms, the Commission decided, upon motion made by <br />Mr. Williams, seconded by Mr. Place and unanimously carried, to <br />'submit he contract proposal of Parkins, Rogers and Associates, Inc. <br />to HHFA Regional Office for their concurrence. <br />V. REQUISITION FOR ADVANCE OF FEDERAL FUNDS INDIANA R -39 <br />On motion made by Mr. Koczan, seconded by Mr. Place and unanimously <br />carried, the Commission approved the Requisition for Advance Pay- <br />ment - orm H -6123 in the amount of $7,180 for Indiana Project R -39 <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.