RM 07-19-62 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

IX. PROGRESS REPORT - Continued Mr. Lynch requested to know the reason. for, the delay in._ ...DEMOLITION payment of approximately $2,830, which he states is due PAYMENT to the Interstate Demolition Corporation in connection DELAY with w rk in the Sample Street Project Area. He was advised by the Commission that Interstate Demoli,- . tion C rporation will be paid in accordance with the terms of the contract However, it was pointed out to Mr. Lynch that he must comply with the terms of the contract and specif' cations first. The fo lowing points were listed in a letter by the Execu- tive D'rector to the demolition contractor in accordance with ijastructions by the Commission: 1. Debris has been stored on vacant parcels after 90% of the demolition payment was made to you. Such payment was only due you after the land was cleared and all work completed. Storage of this debris does not consti- to e completion of the work on such lots. 2. Im rovements located on the following parcels have been =,m olished without having received written authority the Redevelopment Commission to do so: Parcel 7 -7 1021 Dunham Parcel 12--32 840 McPherson 3. Ce tain sidewalks on Scott Street, Chapin Street, and Prairie Avenue have been damaged, which you have,failed to repair despite requests of you to do:so.., 4. Specifications in your contract have not been complied with in reference to capping and disconnecting sewers anI water lines, particularly on a number of parcels: of real estate on which you have already been paid 90% of the contract price. 5. F di Llure to completely demolish buildings turned over to a within the time limit given for demolition. We ^ect your attention to Section 404 of your Contract Lch provides for damages of $50.00 per calendar day each delay. The Redevelopment Commission has not Lved its right to damages under this Section. M70