SM 06-14-62 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

IV. INTERSTATE DEMOLITION LETTER REMOVAL OF SLABS also emphasized strongly that Mr. Lynch was expected to continue to work. They advised that Mr. Lynch report in writing any objection or claim he may have to the Commission for their consi- deration. V. VAL OF CITY BUDGET On m tion made by Mr. Helmen, seconded by Mr. Koczan and unanimously carried, the Commission approved the submittal of the Urban Renewal Comm' ssion budget to the City, as prepared. VI. PROGRESS REP( Mr. Bielicki informed the Commission of a letter from HHFA, Chicago, which reported on rent collection prac- tices in the Sample Street Area. Generally, HHFA seems to be satisfied. Their suggestions were, 1) to deter- mine exactly what the situation is to relief recipients, 2) w should not automatically apply relocation payment to b ck rentals. The Commission, upon discussion, stated that in each and Every case where the relocation payment will be applied towards the removal of rental delinquencies, theSE cases must be reviewed by the Commission before any 4ction is taken. On a motion made by Mr. Helmen, seconded by Mr. Place and unanimously carried, the Commission determined that the time for the application for payment of Relocation Clainis has been extended from four months to a period of six months. This extension of time was granted so that the applicants for the Relocation Payment would have a greater amount of time available to them for the submission of claims. Mr, �ielicki reported that the following rentals were due rom the persons listed below: BADGER, Jodie,IParcel 9 -6. Paid $45 Relocation Claim towards rent, still due $40.26. Delinquent rent amount too small to be economically feasible to attempt to collect it. DELINQUENT RENT IND. R -7 RELOCATION CLAIMS - TIME EXTENSION WRITING- OFF UNCOLLECT- IBLE BACK RENT